never tried enabling CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PS3 option before
so not sure if this is a new problem or an old one.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On non-PS3, we get:
| kernel BUG at drivers/rtc/rtc-ps3.c:36!
because the rtc-ps3 platform device is registered unconditionally in a kernel
with builtin support for PS3.
Reported-by: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert.uytterhoe
| }
1) | .die() {
1) |.oops_enter() {
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
some crazy crap with it.
-- Steve
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 11:02 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Steven Rostedt wrote:
Ah, seems the bug happens to be in the module handling. Does the call
back always have .mod_return_to_handler?
Yes. Every time it ends up in .mod_return_to_handler
BTW
00 01 bl 1ac0 .pcpu_alloc+0x754
1ac4: 60 00 00 00 nop
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Sachin Sant wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Ah... sorry about that. Sachin, is it possible for you to build the
kernel with debug info and ask gdb where the stalling NIP is in the c
file?
6NET: Registered protocol family 10
3BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 61s! [modprobe:1865]
4Modules linked
Sachin Sant wrote:
Sachin Sant wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Ah... sorry about that. Sachin, is it possible for you to build the
kernel with debug info and ask gdb where the stalling NIP is in the c
file?
6NET: Registered protocol family 10
3BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 61s! [modprobe
Tejun Heo wrote:
Can you please apply the attached patch and see whether anything
interesting shows up in the kernel log?
Thanks Tejun for the debug patch. Attached here are the relevant logs.
The only messages related to percpu in the logs are
6PERCPU: Embedded 2 pages/cpu
Tejun Heo wrote:
Sachin Sant wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Can you please apply the attached patch and see whether anything
interesting shows up in the kernel log?
Thanks Tejun for the debug patch. Attached here are the relevant logs.
The only messages related to percpu
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
1:mon c 0
0:mon t
[link register ] c016d0d0 .pcpu_alloc+0x8a4/0xae4
[c000da427960] c016d094 .pcpu_alloc+0x868/0xae4
Tejun Heo wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Sachin Sant wrote:
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating -1 - 18 c000db70fb00
c000db70fb00:c000db70fb00
4PERCPU: relocated c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating 18 - 16 c000db70fb00
c1120320
c004bdbc 4182002c beq c004bde8#
.memset+0x88/0xfc
c004bdc0 f886 std r4,0(r6)
At this point R06 contains d7f0.
Have attached the xmon log.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
diff -Naurp a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S 2009-10-06 15:31
Enabling function graph causes oops due to usage of LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE().
As explained by Ben the usage of LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE generates relocs that are
not supported when CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is set.
Switch to LOAD_REG_ADDR().
Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
Enabling function
().
Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
diff -Naurp old/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
new/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
--- old/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S 2009-10-08 18:37:44.0 +0530
+++ new/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S 2009-10-08 18:34:33.0 +0530
@@ -1038,8 +1038,8
the assembly,
we now always do the comparison between vmalloc and ioremap.
Signed-off-by; Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
---
Sachin, can you verify that works for you ?
Works great. Thanks Ben.
Tested by: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
Regards
-Sachin
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 20:21 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Switch to LOAD_REG_ADDR().
Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
diff -Naurp old/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
new/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
--- old/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S 2009-10-08 18
= c02f0cb0 xer = 200a trap = 700
3:mon
Have attached the boot log. Next tree for 20091030 worked fine.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Sachin Sant wrote:
Today's next tree failed to boot on a POWER 6 box with :
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at mm/mmap.c:2135!
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#2]
SMP NR_CPUS=1024 NUMA pSeries
Problem exists with today's next as well.
Likely cause for this problem
David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:08:44PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Sachin Sant wrote:
Today's next tree failed to boot on a POWER 6 box with :
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at mm/mmap.c:2135!
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#2]
SMP NR_CPUS=1024
--- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 0fff89a8ff40
SP (fffdf8a2460) is in userspace
Have attached the complete boot log.
At the time of crash values of mm and mm-nr_ptes were
7exit_mmap(): mm c000fa9f9580 nr_ptes 1
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM
.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Thanks David for the patch. With this patch on top of next-20091123
my test machine boots fine.
Regards
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org
/?l=linux-kernelm=125802682922299w=2
I will try few more iterations with and without the above
patch just to make sure i have the correct results.
If someone has a suggestion let me know.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 16:23 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing cpu_hotplug(from autotest) tests against latest
next on a power6 box, the machine locks up. A soft reset shows
the following trace
Have you heard anything about that one yet or it's
unsigned intâ
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:345: error: format â%08xâ expects type
âunsigned intâ, but argument 5 has type âlong unsigned intâ
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c: In function âhtab_initializeâ:
... SNIP ...
Signed-off-by: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
diff -Naurp
'unsigned
int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
... SNIP ...
Signed-off-by: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
diff -Naurp a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c 2009-12-14 11:14:01.0 +0530
+++ b/arch
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 16:23 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing cpu_hotplug(from autotest) tests against latest
next on a power6 box, the machine locks up. A soft reset shows
the following trace
cpu 0x0: Vector: 100 (System Reset) at [cc9333d0]
pc
. dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
XMON dest_cpu = 0
XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
XMON dest_cpu = 0
Let me know if i should try to record any specific value ?
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems
,
,,,,,,,,
,,0002
XMON dest_cpu = 1
hope i got the data correct.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
for SMP and UP case */
set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
+ set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
}
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore
Xiaotian Feng wrote:
Does this testcase hotplug cpu 0 off?
No, i don't think so. It skips cpu0 during online/offline
process.
thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Xiaotian Feng wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Xiaotian Feng wrote:
Does this testcase hotplug cpu 0 off?
No, i don't think so. It skips cpu0 during online/offline
process.
Then how could this happen ? Looks like cpu 0
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo
to find a solution
for this issue ?
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc
...@ellerman.id.au
---
Yup that works. Thanks.
Regards
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
Sachin Sant wrote:
Today's next failed to boot on a powerpc box
(Power6 blade IBM,7998-61X) with following recursive locking message.
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.29-next-20090325 #1
After bisecting the failure seems
-Sachin
[1] - CPU Hotplug test which is part of LTP.
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
6Phyp-dump disabled at boot time.
6Using pSeries machine description.
7Page orders
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:57 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing CPU HotPlug[1] tests i observed that during
every cpu offline process an exception is thrown.
Looks like a BUG_ON() to me... can you look at what other
messages just before that ?
I
(first use in this function)
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dtl.c:238: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dtl.c:238: error: for each function it appears
in.)
Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
---
* Fixes the following build error
] [c0008554] syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
72 bind 65536).
6TCP reno registered.
6NET: Registered protocol family 1.
6Unpacking initramfs... done.
7irq: irq 655360 on host null mapped
= 0001 trap = 300
dar = 0010 dsisr = 4000
On subsequent reboots, i observed similar oops during bootup.
I have attached the oops message here.
Let me know if i can provide any other information.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux
);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(cfqq-p_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(cfqq-fifo);
atomic_set(cfqq-ref, 0);
Yes. The above patch fixed this oops. Thanks
Regards
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Sachin Sant wrote:
Sachin Sant wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:57 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing CPU HotPlug[1] tests i observed that during
every cpu offline process an exception is thrown.
Looks like a BUG_ON() to me... can you look at what
cpus without
any problem.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
bytes
Complete dmesg attached. Let me know if you need any other info. I will
try yesterday's next
tree to check if this problem can be recreated.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org
don't get any extra information other that what is
already reported.
Have attached the boot log captured using loglevel=8 mminit_loglevel=4
options.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Nick Piggin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:06:36AM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Hmm, OK. Can you post the disassembly of your pidmap_init please?
Here is the information.
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x0010
Faulting instruction address
info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
Using 00825420 bytes for initrd buffer
Please wait, loading kernel...
Allocated 00f0 bytes for kernel @ 00d0
Elf64 kernel loaded...
Loading ramdisk...
ramdisk loaded
Sachin Sant wrote:
Yesterday's next failed to boot on various powerpc boxes
with following error :
NET: Registered protocol family 15
registered taskstats version 1
Freeing unused kernel memory: 640k freed
doing fast boot
scsi_mod: Unknown ADD relocation: 26
WARNING: Error inserting scsi_mod
on my power boxes with it.
thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
was introduced by commit 4610ee1d36...
kprobes: Introduce generic insn_slot framework
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
(kprobe_opcode_t));
if (idx = 0 idx slots_per_page(c)) {
WARN_ON(kip-slot_used[idx] != SLOT_USED);
if (dirty) {
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
This problem seem to have started with
2.6.34-rc1-git9 (352d4657b23fbd329efccc396000a549e0150907).
Haven't yet tried a git bisect. Boot log attached
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Amit Shah wrote:
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [14:43:56], Sachin Sant wrote:
And this suggests that hvc_kick() is called before hvc_task is
initialised, ie, before hvc_init() is called.
Does this help?
Hi Amit,
I too ran into this issue as reported by Anton. Unfortunately in my
case
] [c0033b20] .kernel_thread+0x54/0x70
Instruction dump:
e93e8190 8009 2f80 409e03f8 48280539 6000 2fa3 419e03e8
e93e8198 8009 2f80 409e03d8 0fe0 480003d0 e93e8140 fb9d
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:48:55 +0530
Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
2.6.34-rc3 boot on a power5 box produces this badness message
during ibmvscsi initialization.
ibmvscsi 3003: Client reserve enabled
ibmvscsi 3003: sent SRP login
ibmvscsi 3003
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Could you try the fix Wolfram Sang sent to linux-kernel yesterday?
Yes that fixed the issue for me. Thanks Eric.
Regards
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
);
-
if (hp-ops-notifier_del)
hp-ops-notifier_del(hp, hp-data);
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Sachin Sant wrote:
With today's next release, eHEA network interface on couple
of power6 boxes fails to initialize.
# modprobe ehea
IBM eHEA ethernet device driver (Release EHEA_0102)
alloc irq_desc for 256 on node 0
alloc kstat_irqs on node 0
irq: irq 590080 on host null mapped to virtual
389f0040 4bfffdbd 7c63e838
7c7d07b4 2fbd 409e0030 3bff00c8 881f 2f80 409eff60 881f0020
---[ end trace cb522a034d760fb8 ]---
next-20100428 was OK. Will try to bisect.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology
Sachin Sant wrote:
With today's next eHEA drivers fails to initialize.
If i revert the following patch eHEA network interface is initialized
properly.
commit cebfe0b6709abdab997c1a00499d67efa32ee1f0
drivercore: Add of_match_table to the common device drivers
Thanks
-Sachin
IBM eHEA
Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Sachin Sant wrote:
With today's next eHEA drivers fails to initialize.
If i revert the following
e96d0040 e93b 7ce95a14
7fe9582a 2fbf 419e0014 e81b001a 7c1f002a 7c09592a 481c 7f46d378
---[ end trace f24cb0cb5729d2bb ]---
And few more of these. Previous snapshot release 2.6.35-rc1-git5(6c5de280b6...)
was good.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux
that the problem goes away after applying the commit 386f40c.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc
695e9dc0c5a9da30 ]---
attempt to access beyond end of device
Next May 7 with same config boots fine.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
boot: next
Using
$file
I have attached the dmesg log here. Let me know if any other information
is required.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
Using 007bc904 bytes
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:16:10PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Today's Next tree failed to boot on a Power6 box with following BUG :
This doesn't actually appear to be a SCSI bug ... it looks like SCSI tried
to allocate memory and things went wrong in the memory
tests with SLQB. Any ideas, Nick?
Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with
SLUB on the same machine.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:55PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with
SLUB on the same machine.
Is it 100% reproducable with SLQB? Our errors were fairly hard to tickle
on demand.
Yes. I am
Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:57:22PM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:22:48 +0530
Todays Next failed to boot on a Power6 JS22 blade with following oops.
Jiri, I suspect this might be your address list
information on this. I have been able to recreate this issue consistently.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
Using 007b9f91 bytes for initrd buffer
Please wait, loading kernel...
Allocated 00c0 bytes for kernel @ 0230
Elf64 kernel loaded...
Loading
to virtual irq 16
Observed similar problem with git4 as well. This doesn't seem to be a
widespread problem
and currently observing this on one out of 3 power6 machines.
Complete dmesg and .config(gzipped) attached.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux
Sachin Sant wrote:
Today's Next tree failed to boot on a Power6 box with following BUG :
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, modprobe/63
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0xc994838
Faulting instruction address: 0xc035f5a8
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig
):PASS
mmap-cow 19 20 (32):PASS
mmap-cow 19 20 (64):PASS
set shmmax limit to 335544320
shm-fork 10 10 (32):PASS
shm-fork 10 10 (64):PASS
shm-fork 10 20 (32):
shm-fork was executed when the oops occurred.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
shm-fork 10 10 (64):PASS
shm-fork 10 20 (32):cpu 0x1: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000faa13490]
pc: c0038240: .hpte_need_flush+0x1bc/0x2d8
lr
Pekka J Enberg wrote:
Hi Sachin,
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Sachin Sant wrote:
I can still recreate this bug on a Power 6 hardware with today's next tree.
I can recreate this problem at will.
Let me know if i can help in debugging this problem.
Can you please reproduce the issue
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo
type
..SNIP..
Porbably because of commit 526e9a09d2e2dcb6c75c68710465678bb647e5fe
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https
/powerpc/kernel/power7-pmu.c:298: error: array index in initializer not of
integer type
..SNIP..
Reported-by: Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput jaswinderraj...@gmail.com
---
Yes this fixed the build error.
Thanks
-Sachin
config.
I came across the following mail from Ben so this could be a know issue.
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073102.html
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 16:59 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing Hugetlbfs tests against 2.6.30-rc8-git1 on a
Power 6 box observed the following OOPS message.
I was able to recreate this with 2.6.30-git7.
Here is the supporting data.
cpu 0x1: Vector: 300
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_hash64.o: file format elf64-powerpc
Disassembly of section .text:
.__flush_tlb_pending
...@kernel.crashing.org
Thanks for the patch. The machine survived after two days of
testing with hugetlbfs tests.
Regards
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
();
Have attached the cgroups regression test run log.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
cgroup_regression_test1 PASS : no kernel bug was found
/ltp
Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:21 +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
While executing cgroups regression tests from LTP May 2009
release on a Power6 box came across the following bug.
This is with 2.6.30-git10 (300df7dc89cc276377fc020704e34875d5c473b6)
Looks like
, flags);
WARN_ON(ld-refcount); ===
...
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
-
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
Sachin Sant wrote:
2.6.30-git14 (0732f87761dbe417cb6e084b712d07e879e876ef) fails to boot
on various PowerPC machines. Here are last few boot messages from a
Power6
box.
SNIP
I will go back and check what changes between git10 and git11
could have caused this boot failure.
The offending
.__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x9c/0x1f4
lr = c060abc8 .mutex_lock+0x50/0x70
msr = 80081032 cr = 8422
ctr = 00136f8c xer = 0001 trap = 100
0:mon
Let me know if i can provide more information.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux
Sachin Sant wrote:
I came across the following badness message during shutdown on a
Power6 box.
This was with 2.6.30-git12(3fe0344faf7fdcb158bd5c1a9aec960a8d70c8e8)
[ cut here ]
Badness at drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c:210
The badness message is still present with git18
what is going on here.
This issue can be recreated with 2.6.31-rc2-git4 kernel
(34f25476ace556263784ea2f8173e22b25557a13).
Thanks
-Sachin
--
-
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
