2009/2/12 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
I think that the problem is in the reg part, but I can't understand why.
Isn't it the RAM mpping of my MTD that is the first address ?
No, it's the offset into the chipselect.
Hi everybody !
I am currently trying to add the support of partitions for the Flash chip on
my MPC8272ADS board (the chips are Sharp LH28F016SCT-L90).
I have added this part:
fl...@0,0 {
compatible = jedec-flash;
reg = 0x0 0x0 0x200;
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Hi everybody !
I am currently trying to add the support of partitions for the Flash
chip on my MPC8272ADS board (the chips are Sharp LH28F016SCT-L90).
I have added this part:
fl...@0,0 {
compatible = jedec-flash;
2009/2/12 Pieter phenn...@vastech.co.za
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Warning (reg_format): reg property in
/local...@f0010100/fl...@0,0/partit...@ff80 has invalid length (8
JM
You are missing some definitions, The #address-cells and #size-cells = 1;
tis is a snippet of teh dts i
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2009/2/12 Pieter phenn...@vastech.co.za
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Warning (reg_format): reg property in
/local...@f0010100/fl...@0,0/partit...@ff80 has invalid length (8
JM
You are missing some definitions,
2009/2/12 David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2009/2/12 Pieter phenn...@vastech.co.za
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Warning (reg_format): reg property in
/local...@f0010100/fl...@0,0/partit...@ff80 has
2009/2/12 Pieter phenn...@vastech.co.za
Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2009/2/12 David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
mailto:da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
2009/2/12 Pieter phenn...@vastech.co.za
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
I think that the problem is in the reg part, but I can't understand why.
Isn't it the RAM mpping of my MTD that is the first address ?
No, it's the offset into the chipselect.
-Scott
