@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_stru
ret = ptrace_put_reg(child, numReg, freg);
} else {
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
-((unsigned int *)child-thread.regs)[index] = d
ata;
In message 8394.1239000...@neuling.org you wrote:
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_stru
ret = ptrace_put_reg(child, numReg, freg);
} else {
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
-
So if you're looking fixing 32 bit apps ptracing 64 bit apps, does that
mean we can get a single 32 bit GDB that'll ptrace both 64 and 32 bit
apps?
Currently gdb only supports 32x64 debugging for the SPU.
Ok, thanks.
@@ -263,7 +263,8 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_struct
Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org writes:
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_stru
ret = ptrace_put_reg(child, numReg, freg);
} else {
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
-((unsigned int
Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org writes:
So if you're looking fixing 32 bit apps ptracing 64 bit apps, does that
mean we can get a single 32 bit GDB that'll ptrace both 64 and 32 bit
apps?
Currently gdb only supports 32x64 debugging for the SPU.
@@ -263,7 +263,8 @@ long
In message m2myb32rk8@igel.home you wrote:
Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org writes:
@@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_stru
ret = ptrace_put_reg(child, numReg, freg);
} else {
flush_fp_to_thread(child);
-
The ptrace compat wrapper mishandles access to the fpu registers. The
PTRACE_PEEKUSR and PTRACE_POKEUSR requests miscalculate the index into
the fpr array due to the broken FPINDEX macro. The
PPC_PTRACE_PEEKUSR_3264 request needs to use the same formula that the
native ptrace interface uses when
The ptrace compat wrapper mishandles access to the fpu registers. The
PTRACE_PEEKUSR and PTRACE_POKEUSR requests miscalculate the index into
the fpr array due to the broken FPINDEX macro. The
PPC_PTRACE_PEEKUSR_3264 request needs to use the same formula that the
native ptrace interface uses
