On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:27 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com 15.10.09 00:57
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 11:42 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:49:29 am Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:27 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
My perspective is that it just uncovered already existing brokenness.
Sorry, I thought it was clear, but to be more
Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com 15.10.09 00:57
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
original: built but didn't work
Jan's:
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
original: built but didn't work
Jan's: doesn't build
Rusty's: builds and works
Where do you
Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and
also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap:
original: built but didn't work
Jan's: doesn't build
Rusty's: builds and works
Where do you want to go from here?
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology
Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com 02.10.09 17:48
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 07:35 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
The one Rusty suggested the other day may help here. I don't like it
as a drop-in replacement for BUILD_BUG_ON() though (due to it
deferring the error generated to the linking stage), I'd
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 07:35 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com 30.09.09 01:39
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the
roel kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com 29.09.09 11:51
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@novell.com wrote:
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the comment):
/* type has to be known at build
Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com 30.09.09 01:39
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the comment):
/* type has to be known at build time for
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the comment):
/* type has to be known at build time for optimization */
-BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(type));
+BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(type));
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@novell.com wrote:
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the comment):
/* type has to be known at build time for optimization */
-
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hollis Blanchard 09/29/09 2:00 AM
First, I think there is a real bug here, and the code should read like
this (to match the comment):
/* type has to be known at build time for optimization */
-
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:21 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c:31:
arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.h: In function 'kvmppc_account_exit_stat':
arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.h:51:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c:31:
arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.h: In function 'kvmppc_account_exit_stat':
arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.h:51: error: bit-field 'anonymous' width not an
integer constant
In file
14 matches
Mail list logo
