On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges
sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that
Hi,
I am trying to run tcl of my PPC460ex board. I have download the
tcl-8.3.3-sol26-sparc-local.gz file. But when I run it I get the Syntax
error.
I am not sure if I missed out something.
I would really appreciate it if somebody could help me on this.
Thanks,
efti
--
View this message in
Instead of looping over each irq and checking against the irq array
bounds, adjust the bounds before looping.
The old code will not free any irq if the irq + count is above
irq_virq_count because the test in the loop is testing irq + count
instead of irq + i.
This code checks the limits to avoid
Here are a few cleanups and fies mostly around the previous series
and a few more as I continue to explore exporting the irq_host concept
for other architectures.
milton
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
The comment claims we will call host-ops-map() to update the flags if
we find a previously established mapping, but we never did. We used
to call remap, but that call was removed in da05198002 (powerpc: Remove
irq_host_ops-remap hook).
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller milt...@bga.com
Index:
Look up the descriptor and check that it is found in handle_one_irq
before checking if we are on the irq stack, and call the handler
directly using the descriptor if we are on the stack.
We need check irq_to_desc finds the descriptor to avoid a NULL
pointer dereference. It could have failed
The 8xx cpm_cascade was calling irq_eoi for the cascaded irq,
but that will already have been called by the handle_fasteoi_irq
that generic_handle_irq will call. The handler is set in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c by the host map routine.
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller milt...@bga.com
Index:
Since kmem caches are allocated before init_IRQ as noted in 3af259d155
(powerpc: Radix trees are available before init_IRQ), we now call
kmalloc in all cases and can can always call kfree if we are asked
to allocate a duplicate or conflicting IRQ_HOST_MAP_LEGACY host.
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller
Rename functions and arguments to reflect current usage. iic_cause_ipi
becomes iic_message_pass and iic_ipi_to_irq becomes iic_msg_to_irq,
and iic_request_ipi now takes a message (msg) instead of an ipi number.
Also mesg is renamed to msg.
Commit f1072939b6 (powerpc: Remove checks for MSG_ALL
The radix-tree code uses call_rcu when freeing internal elements.
We must protect against the elements being freed while we traverse
the tree, even if the returned pointer will still be valid.
While preparing a patch to expand the context in which
irq_radix_revmap_lookup will be called, I
Hello Shawn,
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
+#define cpu_is_mx25()(0)
+#define cpu_is_mx35()(0)
+#define cpu_is_mx51()(0)
+#define cpu_is_imx() (0)
+#else
+#define cpu_is_imx() (1)
+#endif
... e.g. that looks a bit frightening.
Agree.
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:30 +0530, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
+ ret = nand_scan_tail(priv-mtd);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
We've just removed this macro, it should be merged upstream soon, but it
is in the mtd tree so far.
+ /* First look
On Mon, 23 May 2011 about 12:54:25 -, Dave Carroll wrote:
When using 64K pages with a separate cpio rootfs, U-Boot will align
the rootfs on a 4K page boundary. When the memory is reserved, and
subsequent early memblock_alloc is called, it will allocate memory
between the 64K page alignment
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:46:19AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Shawn,
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
+#define cpu_is_mx25() (0)
+#define cpu_is_mx35() (0)
+#define cpu_is_mx51() (0)
+#define cpu_is_imx() (0)
+#else
+#define cpu_is_imx()
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 23:43:08 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:25 +0530, Prashant Bhole wrote:
Fixed the problem by soft resetting the PCIe port in the function
ppc460ex_pciex_port_init_hw().
Is it a right thing to do?
snip
Well, it's odd that you'd have to do
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:59 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
include/linux/ftrace_event.h |4 +-
include/linux/perf_event.h| 10 +---
kernel/perf_event.c | 49
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:49:55AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
Gabriel,
I am looking for the most-tested Linux distro for POWER7 architecture.
IBM partnered with RedHat and Novell to make sure RHEL6 and SLES11 SP1 are
well tested with POWER7. Essential back-ports and bug are included in
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0700, efti wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run tcl of my PPC460ex board. I have download the
tcl-8.3.3-sol26-sparc-local.gz file. But when I run it I get the Syntax
error.
That tarball seems to indicate it's for both Solaris and Sparc.
PPC460ex is neither of those.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 23:43:08 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:25 +0530, Prashant Bhole wrote:
Fixed the problem by soft resetting the PCIe port in the function
ppc460ex_pciex_port_init_hw().
Is it a
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0700, efti wrote:
I am trying to run tcl of my PPC460ex board. I have download the
tcl-8.3.3-sol26-sparc-local.gz file. But when I run it I get
the Syntax error.
That tarball seems to indicate it's for both Solaris and Sparc.
PPC460ex is neither
Here are what the patch set does.
* Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be
a pure common helper function providers.
* Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx,
sdhci-dove, sdhci-tegra, and sdhci-esdhc-imx to make them self
registered with
The patch turns the common stuff in sdhci-pltfm.c into functions, and
add device drivers their own .probe and .remove which in turn call
into the common functions, so that those sdhci-pltfm device drivers
register itself and keep all device specific things away from common
sdhci-pltfm file.
The patch turns the sdhci-of-core common stuff into helper functions
added into sdhci-pltfm.c, and makes sdhci-of device drviers self
registered using the same pair of .probe and .remove used by
sdhci-pltfm device drivers.
As a result, sdhci-of-core.c and sdhci-of.h can be eliminated with
those
The structure sdhci_pltfm_data is not necessarily to be in a public
header like include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h, so the patch moves it
into drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h and eliminates the former one.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely
The patch migrates the use of sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data to
sdhci_pltfm_host and sdhci_pltfm_data, so that the former pair can
be eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
I am looking for the most-tested Linux distro for POWER7 architecture.
IBM partnered with RedHat and Novell to make sure RHEL6 and SLES11 SP1 are
well tested with POWER7. Essential back-ports and bug are included in
^ bug _fixes_
We
Hello Matthew,
You have made a patch powerpc/fsl_booke: Add support to boot from core other
than 0 some time ago, so you probably worked with booting the kernel on a cpu
subset, particularly on the core other than 0.
Could you please describe any details how you ran the kernel from u-boot on
* Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:59 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
include/linux/ftrace_event.h |4 +-
include/linux/perf_event.h| 10 +---
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
We do _NOT_ make any decision based on the trace point so what's the
pre-existing active role in the syscall entry code?
The seccomp code we are discussing in this thread.
That isn't pre-existing, that's proposed.
But face it, you can
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:59 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
include/linux/ftrace_event.h |4 +-
Ben,
On 19.05.2011 [10:46:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 19.05.2011 [17:43:56 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:25 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
From: Milton Miller milt...@bga.com
The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Gabbasov, Andrew
andrew_gabba...@mentor.com wrote:
Hello Matthew,
You have made a patch
powerpc/fsl_booke: Add support to boot from core other than 0 some time
ago, so you probably worked with booting the kernel on a cpu subset,
particularly on the core other
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:34:18AM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
The radix-tree code uses call_rcu when freeing internal elements.
We must protect against the elements being freed while we traverse
the tree, even if the returned pointer will still be valid.
While preparing a patch to expand
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:06:27 +
Jain Priyanka-B32167 b32...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
-Original Message-
From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
Cc: rtc-li...@googlegroups.com;
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 01:34 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
The 8xx cpm_cascade was calling irq_eoi for the cascaded irq,
but that will already have been called by the handle_fasteoi_irq
that generic_handle_irq will call. The handler is set in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c by the host map routine.
From: Dave Carroll dcarr...@astekcorp.com
When using 64K pages with a separate cpio rootfs, U-Boot will align
the rootfs on a 4K page boundary. When the memory is reserved, and
subsequent early memblock_alloc is called, it will allocate memory
between the 64K page alignment and reserved memory.
From: Dave Carroll dcarr...@astekcorp.com
When using 64K pages with a separate cpio rootfs, U-Boot will align
the rootfs on a 4K page boundary. When the memory is reserved, and
subsequent early memblock_alloc is called, it will allocate memory
between the 64K page alignment and reserved memory.
smp_release_cpus() waits for all cpus (including the bootcpu) due to an
off-by-one count on boot_cpu_count (which is all CPUs). This patch replaces
that with spinning_secondaries (which is all secondary CPUs).
Signed-off-by: Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h |2
Hi Linus !
This is a bit more than I expected to send you that late in the merge
window, but hopefully none of it should be problematic. A couple of
patches were simply delayed due to misunderstandings as to which tree
they should go through (4xx MSI and ftrace).
There's a generic patch to
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:40 +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
This patch adds MSI support for 440SPe, 460Ex, 460Sx and 405Ex.
Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah rsar...@apm.com
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri tma...@apm.com
Ok so I sent the patch to Linus today. However I had to manually fix it
up
40 matches
Mail list logo
