On Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:08:30 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
> >> replicating the same snippet of code.
On 17/11/16 14:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:08:30 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
On 17/11/16 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
counting is either missing or incorrect.
This
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:50:50 AM CET Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
> replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
> counting is either missing or incorrect.
>
> This patch adds support to read the
Currently platforms/drivers needing to get the machine model name are
replicating the same snippet of code. In some case, the OF reference
counting is either missing or incorrect.
This patch adds support to read the machine model name either using
the "model" or the "compatible" property in the
