Hi Jiri,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:37 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted
> >> patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:37:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted
> > > patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not
On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted
patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add
them in the first place.
But fix the docs first.
I am personally
On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted
patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add
them in the first place.
But fix the docs first.
I am personally not biased to any variant (as in: I don't
Finn Thain writes:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> >> > > ---
>> >> > (here is a good location for Cc:)
>> >>
>> >> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
>> >> be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this
>> >> convention
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 6:06 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:57 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >> > > Cc: Michael Ellerman
> >> > > Cc: Nicholas Piggin
> >> > >
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:15 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > > > ---
> > > > (here is a good location for Cc:)
> > >
> > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
> > > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> > > ---
> >> > (here is a good location for Cc:)
> >>
> >> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
> >> be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this
> >> convention changed recently?
>
> The
Andy Shevchenko writes:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:57 AM Finn Thain wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> > > Cc: Michael Ellerman
>> > > Cc: Nicholas Piggin
>> > > Cc: Christophe Leroy
>> > > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>> > > Cc: "Naveen N.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > > ---
> > > (here is a good location for Cc:)
> >
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
> > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this
> > convention changed recently?
>
> I see, I
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:57 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > > Cc: Michael Ellerman
> > > Cc: Nicholas Piggin
> > > Cc: Christophe Leroy
> > > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> > > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao"
> > > Cc:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:07 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04. 04. 24, 0:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> >> Cc: Nicholas Piggin
> >> Cc: Christophe Leroy
> >> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
> >> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao"
> >> Cc:
On 04. 04. 24, 0:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Nicholas Piggin
Cc: Christophe Leroy
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao"
Cc: linux-m...@lists.linux-m68k.org
Second, please move these Cc to be after the '---' line
Sorry, but why?
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ...
>
> First of all, please read this
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces-in-commit-messages
> and amend the commit message accordingly.
>
Right -- the call chain is described in the commit log
Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:11:33PM +1100, Finn Thain kirjoitti:
> The mitigation was intended to stop the irq completely. That might have
> been better than a hard lock-up but it turns out that you get a crash
> anyway if you're using pmac_zilog as a serial console.
>
> That's because the pr_err()
15 matches
Mail list logo
