Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Jari Nguyen Trung Thanh
Hello, I'm a junior, pls help me... I'm using Hardhat 2.2.14, and I ported it in a custom board successfully. This board has its own realtime clock, pls tell me where I can modify in the kernel so that all of the time function in linux can use my realtime clock...such as date function...or

New ppcboot Questions

2001-01-10 Thread Micael balow
Dear sir, I'd like to ask you which compiler you used to compile ppcboot-0.4.4-pre1 package in order to get a working ppcboot.srec file.Some one advise me to use CDK 1.2. But after I finished reading the manual of CDK 1.2, I found that, CDK 1.2 is a Cross Development Kit for Host-Target

New ppcboot Questions

2001-01-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Micael, in message 20010110060652.49687.qmail at web11702.mail.yahoo.com you wrote: I'd like to ask you which compiler you used to compile ppcboot-0.4.4-pre1 package in order to get a I have sent you SEVERAL messages (Tue, 02 Jan 2001; Sat, 06 Jan 2001; Mon, 08 Jan 2001) telling you

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Jari Nguyen Trung Thanh wrote: Hello, I'm a junior, pls help me... I'm using Hardhat 2.2.14, and I ported it in a custom board successfully. This board has its own realtime clock, pls tell me where I can modify in the kernel so that all of the time function in linux

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Jerry Van Baren
The proper way to handle a RTC is to read it on power up and set the system clock based on it. From then on, the system clock will be correct and everyone will use the system clock efficiently and accurately. On the x86 (PC host), the utility is hwclock (man hwclock). Your best approach is to

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Jari Nguyen Trung Thanh
Thank you, I think that it is the best way which I can do May be I'll try to make it simpler. Thank again, Jari Quoting Jerry Van Baren vanbaren_gerald at si.com: The proper way to handle a RTC is to read it on power up and set the system clock based on it. From then on, the system

TCP Server Boogie

2001-01-10 Thread Steven Vacca
Friends! Friends! Help! Help! Help Here's the updated representation of my problem. I am in dire need of some suggestions. Please, please, please! Important Question: (See Problem info below) Why would a TCP Server do a Denial-of-Service (DoS) to a TCP Client after exactly 10 min

USB device not completing setup

2001-01-10 Thread Peder S�rensen
Hi, I'm working on an USB device (client) on a linux platform (MPC850). When I plug the USB device into a linux PC the USB setup is completing, but never completes when I plug it into a Windows PC (ME or 2000). I do observe when plugged into the Windows PC that the USB device: - is

TCP Server Boogie

2001-01-10 Thread Mike Hill
I have some vague recollection of a similar problem. I was performing pings to our embedded system, and after some number of pings, I don't remember how many, they would begin to timeout. This would only occur if I was pinging at a high rate (about 1200 pings per sec) At the time, I thought it

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message 4.3.2.20010110072315.00bb5230 at falcon.si.com Jerry Van Baren wrote: The proper way to handle a RTC is to read it on power up and set the system clock based on it. From then on, the system clock will be correct and everyone will use the system clock efficiently and accurately.

2.4 Kernel for mpc860

2001-01-10 Thread Thomas
Hi all. I want to compile 2.4 for my custom board with a mpc860. Which source tree should I base my kernel on? Regards, /Thomas Lange/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Wolfgang: A good place to start is the clock mini HOWTO: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Clock.html The astronomy people, among others, are really fanatical about accurate time and have some very elaborate programs to synchronize clocks to the nanosecond (microsecond?) level. These

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message 4.3.2.20010110104647.00baee80 at falcon.si.com you wrote: The astronomy people, among others, are really fanatical about accurate time and have some very elaborate programs to synchronize clocks to the nanosecond (microsecond?) level. These involve NTP daemons. Note that the NTP

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Jerry Van Baren
At 05:22 PM 1/10/01 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message 4.3.2.20010110104647.00baee80 at falcon.si.com you wrote: The astronomy people, among others, are really fanatical about accurate time and have some very elaborate programs to synchronize clocks to the nanosecond (microsecond?)

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Bill Roman
Jerry Van Baren wrote: If you tracked down some references (NTP source code, NTP RFCs, David L. Mills' clock adjustment algorithm), I suspect you would be able to figure out how to properly use adjtimex(). Further, I suspect adjtimex() a pretty lightweight routine since it merely adjusts

2.4 Kernel for mpc860

2001-01-10 Thread Borlizzi Giacomo
Hi, I have same problem. It is not clear wich is better. I'm trying to adapt to my board in this days the linux-2.4.0-test9, previous version was 2.2.13 but now? /Giacomo Borlizzi Thomas wrote: Hi all. I want to compile 2.4 for my custom board with a mpc860. Which source tree should I base

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Wolfgang: A good place to start is the clock mini HOWTO: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Clock.html The astronomy people, among others, are really fanatical about accurate time and have some very elaborate programs to synchronize clocks

Using realtime clock?

2001-01-10 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Yup. However, adjtimex() is a function call that tweaks the clock parameters in the kernel. If you understood those parameters (I don't), you could keep your clock very accurate. Indeed, but the hard part is to compute the parameters for adjtimex

FW: TCP Server Boogie

2001-01-10 Thread Steven Vacca
Could someone who has Redhat EDK 1.0 (kernel 2.2.13) residing on a Motorola MBX860 bd please try the following test and let me know if a connect failure occurs after 10 mins? Let the following run for 10 and 1/2 mins. On a PC: TCP Client: while (1) {

menuconfig for PPC860T

2001-01-10 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:48:01PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:18:44PM -0500, Dan Malek wrote: Brian Ford wrote: For about the last week, make xconfig has stopped working for the EST8260 board in the 2.5 bk tree. It dies with: make[1]: Entering directory

860P FEC and fec driver from 2.3?

2001-01-10 Thread Gessner, Matt
Do this work? I've got someone here who's got the LXT970 PHY and the thing doesn't work with the driver from 2.3 I've got. Has it changed? I don't have access to the bitkeeper tree, so I'm flying a BIT blind here... Can anyone make any recommendations, please? Thanks, Matt ** Sent via the

860P FEC and fec driver from 2.3?

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Malek
Gessner, Matt wrote: Do this work? I've got someone here who's got the LXT970 PHY and the thing doesn't work with the driver from 2.3 I've got. Has it changed? There have been some changes through the course of 2.3 and 2.4. I think Wolfgang Denk finally fixed the FEC driver so it can be use