Ppcboot kernel upgrade problem(2.4.x kernel does not work)

2002-01-15 Thread ByungGiBaek
Dear all, Now I'm trying to upgrade linux kernel from 2.2.14 to 2.4.x on our own MPC860T board(50MHz). I successfully download and boot linux-2.2.14 kernel with ppcboot-0.9.3. But when I tried to boot linux-2.4.x kernel with same ppcboot and same board,I have some problem. I just see under

8240 booting:bootp time out and hd lost interrupt

2002-01-15 Thread 邹涛
Hello: I'm a newer to PowerPC. when i port linux to PowerPC 8240,i met some problem.anyone give me advices will be appreciate. i use board sandpoint 3, the cpu board is mpc8240. I mark the line i wish you pay attention to.i have two questions: one is why the hdc lost the interrupt. the

8240 booting:bootp time out and hd lost interrupt

2002-01-15 Thread Neil Horman
Hello- Not sure if these are going to be you're exact answers, but I've recently tackled both problems on a custom MPC860P based board: 1) I mark the line i wish you pay attention to.i have two questions: one is why the hdc lost the interrupt. I had the same error when trying to

8240 booting:bootp time out and hd lost interrupt

2002-01-15 Thread Jerry Van Baren
On the bootp time out, you appear to be sending ARP packets and not getting a response. Is your BOOTP server properly configured? To be specific, is it configured to be 192.168.10.1? Your etherdump trace (ARP with no response and ICMP unreachable error packets) implies not. Ping it to check,

mpc860 vs. mpc860T

2002-01-15 Thread Steven Vacca
OK, here goes. My 860T rev is: duht-duhduh-duhh: XPC860TZP50B3 :( I guess that means I'll need some workarounds. My embedded linux kernel is Redhat's mpc8xx-2.2.13, so maybe porting in some workarounds might not be too painful. Could I please get access to your workarounds, Magnus?

Marvell/Galileo GT-64260 system controller data sheets

2002-01-15 Thread Clifford van Dyk
Hello I noticed a mention of the Marvell/Galileo GT-64260 system controller in a previous post. I have been trying for more than 2 weeks (email, fax, telephone) to obtain data sheets for the device, with no success. If anyone is able to assist me in obtaining the data sheets, please could you

mpc860 vs. mpc860T

2002-01-15 Thread Steven Vacca
I did a complete search for CONFIG_8xx_CPU6, and truncated variations, in my mpc8xx-2.2.13 kernel, and could not find it. It doesn't show up as a cfg option either. Even a grep on CONFIG_8xx doesn't show anything resembling that. Could it be in there and accessible in an alternative way?

I2C Driver for MPC8xx

2002-01-15 Thread Pergola, Michael
All, I think I found a good I2C driver for the Embedded Planet MPC823e, Dan Malek's i2c-algo-8xx.c. Has anyone successfully implemented this on an EP platform? TIA, Michael Pergola Baltimore, MD 21236 (410) 931-6778 x4259 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See

mpc860 vs. mpc860T

2002-01-15 Thread Steven Vacca
Yes! Yes! Success! I transferred the CONFIG_8xx_CPU6 patches from the linuxPPC sources into my kernel and that solved my problems with the old version of the 860T. Thanks a quadrillion for your help! / \O/ \/ Steven _/\_ -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk

Marvell/Galileo GT-64260 system controller data sheets

2002-01-15 Thread Mark A. Greer
Clifford van Dyk wrote: Hello I noticed a mention of the Marvell/Galileo GT-64260 system controller in a previous post. I have been trying for more than 2 weeks (email, fax, telephone) to obtain data sheets for the device, with no success. If anyone is able to assist me in obtaining the

a MINIMAL405 submodel

2002-01-15 Thread David Updegraff
Greetings. I have made a trivial little patch (and a few files..) to define a minimally configured 405[gp] board. Its basically a 405 with no KB, RTC, PCI, et.al. The idea being that if you define this submodel of CONFIG_4xx then you write loadable modules on your own to handle peripherals;

a MINIMAL405 submodel

2002-01-15 Thread Dan Malek
David Updegraff wrote: ... Might we be able to limit the proliferation of submodel in the PPC 4xx world with the addition of my proposed MINIMAL405 submodel and then let vendors write drivers instead of kernels? The 8xx and 8260 are almost like this. What you will discover over time is a