Hi Kumar,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Kumar Gala wrote:
One thing the code needs is a general name cleanup. Its just confusing
to me for e500 to have 4xx references.
How about the use of booke instead of 4xx?
I seem to use ``booke'' for common name for them like
On Thu, 3 March 2005 09:23:22 +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
Could not confirm that so far! Ebony and Ocotea are working out of the
box, using these defconfig files! (pristine kernel 2.6.11)
With PIBS and on a bamboo? If I was just too stupid and made some
silly mistake, that would be great
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
This patch adds PCI bridge support for MPC8272 and PQ2FADS to the
current linuxppc-2.4 tree. Actually it has been tested with 8272, but
PQ2 _should_ also work, though it will complain that host bridge ID is
unrecognized.
This patch is against the linuxppc-2.4 tree, but it
On Friday 04 March 2005 00:05, J?rn Engel wrote:
On Thu, 3 March 2005 09:23:22 +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
Could not confirm that so far! Ebony and Ocotea are working out of the
box, using these defconfig files! (pristine kernel 2.6.11)
With PIBS and on a bamboo? If I was just too
Adam,
I'm not aware of any such patches (unless Vitaly has some). If you do
this, please port it against linux-2.5 instead of linuxppc-2.5. Also,
if you send me the patches and I will ensure they get pushed upstream
into the stock kernel.
thanks
- kumar
On Mar 3, 2005, at 10:52 PM, Adam
Hi,
we decided to port a 2.6.Kernel from scratch to PPC440GX based board. now
i'm on search for an ethernet pci driver for the 440GX. some time ago i've
found some drivers, but i forgot the linkscan somebody help me??
greetz,
matthias
On Friday 04 March 2005 08:33, Matthias Babylon wrote:
Hi,
we decided to port a 2.6.Kernel from scratch to PPC440GX based board. now
i'm on search for an ethernet pci driver for the 440GX. some time ago i've
found some drivers, but i forgot the linkscan somebody help me??
Hmmm, could
Jeff,
This patch updates the name identifier to list both of the Marvell PHYs
that are supported.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala kumar.gala at freescale.com
---
diff -Nru a/drivers/net/gianfar_phy.c b/drivers/net/gianfar_phy.c
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar_phy.c 2005-03-02 14:20:27 -06:00
+++
Andrew,
Patch adds support for the initial PowerQUICC II Pro processors
(MPC8343/E, MPC8347/E, and MPC8349/E) and the first reference platform
(MPC834x SYS) from Freescale.
The initial support is limited to existing drivers that overlap with the
MPC85xx subarch (ethernet, I2C, uart).
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050304/8ccc68ec/attachment.htm
Matt and Kurmar:
I performed name-cleanup in the driver.
Moreover, I tested this driver with PowerPC405GPr(Sycamore)
in addition to PowerPC440GP(ebony)/MPC8555(MPC8555-CDS).
This driver consist of two patches as follows:
1) Architecture specific part(booke_wdt-arch.patch)
This is the
Matt and Kurmar:
I post the device driver part with this mail.
This is the last part of this driver.
Please apply.
Regards,
Signed-off-by: Takeharu KATO kato.takeharu at jp.fujitsu.com
--- linux-2.6.11/drivers/char/watchdog/Kconfig 2005-03-04 17:14:57.687966296
+0900
+++
Hi Andriy;
I dont know what you should buy but I know what you
should not.
I ordered a Kontron's MPC8540 e2brain board, it took 3
months to get the board, or how to say, only the
hardware of the board, but there was nothing important
(linux source etc) on the cd, then we asked for linux
source to
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:39 +, emre kara wrote:
Hi Andriy;
I dont know what you should buy but I know what you
should not.
I ordered a Kontron's MPC8540 e2brain board, it took 3
months to get the board, or how to say, only the
hardware of the board, but there was nothing important
I am trying to get the 2.6 running on my lite5200 eval board. Is there a tool
chain allready availble or will I need to build my own?
Thanks,
Matt
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050304
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:05:41AM +0100, J?rn Engel wrote:
On Thu, 3 March 2005 09:23:22 +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
Could not confirm that so far! Ebony and Ocotea are working out of the
box, using these defconfig files! (pristine kernel 2.6.11)
With PIBS and on a bamboo? If I was
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:33:06AM +0100, Matthias Babylon wrote:
Hi,
we decided to port a 2.6.Kernel from scratch to PPC440GX based board. now
i'm on search for an ethernet pci driver for the 440GX. some time ago i've
found some drivers, but i forgot the linkscan somebody help me??
You can use crosstool (kegel.com/crosstool) and build the standard
linux ppc toolchain. The core in the 5200 is a standard 603.
- kumar
On Mar 4, 2005, at 8:13 AM, Matt Berry wrote:
I am trying to get the 2.6 running on my lite5200 eval board.? Is
there a tool chain allready availble or
-off-by: Mark A. Greer mgreer at mvista.com
--
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ppc7d.patch
Url:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050304/eaaffcb6/attachment.txt
hello!
I don't really know if this mailing list is the proper place to direct
questions regarding U-Boot, but I've seen some preceding posts about it,
so I thought I'd ask...
I've ported U-Boot over to a custom MPC8560 (PQ3) based board - it works
well, except that after a sw reboot (from linux
Out of interest how did you test this? If I find some time I will test
it on an e500 system, just havent given much thought on how to test the
watchdog though.
- kumar
On Mar 4, 2005, at 3:38 AM, Takeharu KATO wrote:
Matt and Kurmar:
I performed name-cleanup in the driver.
Moreover, I
Matt,
Do you think this really needs a config option? Should it not be
sufficient that if you enable watchdog you get this functionality on
4xx/e500?
- kumar
On Mar 4, 2005, at 3:38 AM, Takeharu KATO wrote:
Matt and Kurmar:
I post the device driver part with this mail.
This is the
On Fri, 4 March 2005 08:39:22 -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
Impossible. You need a 440EP/Bamboo specific port. Memory map is
completely different on 440EP. For discussion sake, note that
440GP/GX are very similar parts with respect to memory map and
peripherals, then 440SP and 440EP each have
-off-by: Mark A. Greer mgreer at mvista.com
--
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ppc7d.patch
Url:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050304/d95420a8/attachment.txt
Sorry for the spam. I horked Andrew's email addr.
Mark
:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050304/4ccdbe37/attachment.htm
Jaka Mo?nik wrote:
hello!
I don't really know if this mailing list is the proper place to direct
questions regarding U-Boot, but I've seen some preceding posts about it,
so I thought I'd ask...
I've ported U-Boot over to a custom MPC8560 (PQ3) based board - it works
well, except that
This is better posted to the u-boot-users list
(u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net)
- kumar
On Mar 4, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Jaka Mo?nik wrote:
hello!
I don't really know if this mailing list is the proper place to direct
questions regarding U-Boot, but I've seen some preceding posts about
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:02:40AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
Matt,
Do you think this really needs a config option? Should it not be
sufficient that if you enable watchdog you get this functionality on
4xx/e500?
I see the 8xx example, however, there may be a case where somebody
wants to
Fair enough, we might actually have multiple watchdogs on some of are
parts when the integrate system logic w/its own watchdog. Makes sense.
Lets leave it a config option then.
- kumar
On Mar 4, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:02:40AM -0600, Kumar Gala
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 09:53, Jaka Mo?nik wrote:
hello!
I don't really know if this mailing list is the proper place to direct
questions regarding U-Boot, but I've seen some preceding posts about it,
so I thought I'd ask...
Let's start with: The U-Boot list is over at:
u-boot-users
Andrew, Greg
Here is a patch for the new 2.6.11 release tree and for Linus.
Fix for trivial fix for 2.6.11 oprofile compilation on e500 based ppc.
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming afleming at freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala kumar.gala at freescale.com
---
diff -Nru
Has anyone else had any issues with building kernels (2.6.11) with
gcc-3.3.3 from YDL4. Ran into a problem today were a 2.6.11 build for
MPC8540 ADS breaks with gcc-3.3.3 but works ok with a 3.4.3.
- kumar
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 18:38 +0900, Takeharu KATO wrote:
Hi Takeharu,
Some comments below. Looks good overall.
--- linux-2.6.11/drivers/char/watchdog/Kconfig2005-03-04
17:14:57.687966296 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.11-booke-wdt/drivers/char/watchdog/Kconfig 2005-03-04
Initialize the mdio_lock spin lock in mii_info struct, which is otherwise
accessed prior to initialization.
Signed-off-by: Jaka Mocnik jaka at activetools.si
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala kumar.gala at freescale.com
---
diff -Nru a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
---
Static initialization of spin locks that are otherwise accessed prior to
initialization.
Signed-off-by: Jaka Mocnik jaka at activetools.si
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala kumar.gala at freescale.com
---
diff -Nru a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
36 matches
Mail list logo
