Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Port number vs name in debug messages?

2020-12-12 Thread Richard Cochran
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 07:40:41PM +0900, Cliff Spradlin via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > The primary identifier in port-related debug messages is the logical > port number. For me, that seems not very useful. Yeah, you are right about that. > What is port 17? I have to go figure that out. Would

[Linuxptp-devel] Port number vs name in debug messages?

2020-12-12 Thread Cliff Spradlin via Linuxptp-devel
The primary identifier in port-related debug messages is the logical port number. For me, that seems not very useful. See for example: ptp4l[152.283]: port 17: LISTENING to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED) What is port 17? I have to go figure that out. Would anyone else be in favor of