Michael and all,
n I see this UK decision as a good sign. All we need now is a similar
one
in the US. It is this kind of nonsense that our own dear William X
practices of a regular occasion that needs to be curtailed. Such
legal decisions in the UK may help the US to take notice in our
LEEDS - This morning Cyber-Rights Cyber-Liberties (UK) criticised
a High Court ruling involving liability for defamatory statements made
by a third party against Demon Internet.
Demon Internet, a major UK ISP is more likely to be found liable for
defamation in a case against Dr. Laurence
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
Godfrey has puoled this stunt on a number of ISP's; he started off with
Universitues; you insult Godfrey and he goes after your upstream. Universitues
usually settled quietly and quickly. This has been going on for about a
decade.
I didn't know that. I guess the
On 26-Mar-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
Godfrey has puoled this stunt on a number of ISP's; he started off with
Universitues; you insult Godfrey and he goes after your upstream.
Universitues
usually settled quietly and quickly. This has been going on for about a
At 06:30 PM 3/26/99 -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
LEEDS - This morning Cyber-Rights Cyber-Liberties (UK) criticised
a High Court ruling involving liability for defamatory statements made
by a third party against Demon Internet.
Demon Internet, a major UK ISP is more likely to be found liable
