[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea. empty?'s current functionality is supplied by the word tail? We
don't lose functionality by modifying the word empty?.
Another option would be to supply a word really-empty? ;-)
Yup. Something like:
really-empty?: func [s [series!]] [empty? head s]
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is understood. I'm talking about how long that staticly contexted 'f
will remain accessible. My expectation is that as long as some live
reference to 'f continues to haunt REBOL, 'f should stay alive as well. Of
course, the value 'f references will be determined
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. I don't think the console will support graphical ANSI
characters in the forseeable future.
:-( Is this not portable or where is the problem? Robert
I don't think this is very portable. Many platforms do not support color codes,
What platforms? I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be something you could do in a browser via CGI?
Yes. But you'd need some javascripts on the browser to make it
really "interactive".
Ciao,
/Gabriele./
o) .-^-. (--o
| Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about Postscript, then? Or just the all-in-one-html?
REBOL said they'll provide the all-in-one html file; other than
that, I think the best is providing a PDF *AND* a PS version.
Postscript file can be easyly viewed and printed on the Amiga too.
Ciao,
Got an improved version of CURRY. Can post it, if anyone's interested.
Ladislav
The first thing (file sizes changing) seems to be due to the MIME content
separator that has been chosen by the browser being of different lengths on
different runs. The POST content is divided up by these separators and so if
the separator length changes by one character, the content length
I don't know about anyone else, but I'd be happy with a beta release that
runs on my Psion 5mx, even if it didn't support console operations or
networking. At least I could play with scripting while curled up on the sofa
instead of sitting in a cold room in front of a PC (sad, I know...)
Andrew
On 10-Dec-1999/12:45:21+1:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. I don't think the console will support graphical ANSI
characters in the forseeable future.
:-( Is this not portable or where is the problem? Robert
I don't think this is very portable. Many platforms do
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like the PalmPilot and other devices which only have a black white screen.
Also, the Amiga console colors are dependent on the Workbench palette and
generally only support 4 colors if I remember correctly. I think those colors
are mapped to the
Hi Ingo,
you wrote
Hey! The "macro/scripting" feature is slated for the dim Future - sometime
past 1.2 (they're on 0.7.5) - how about REBOL for AbiSuite? It's OpenSource
so someone (more qualified than I) could jump right in!
Great idea. Someone (with more time than I) should definitely look
Larry, Jim, others,
This has been entered!
On 9-Dec-1999/13:49:41-8:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Larry,
This is a bug in FORM that should notice that the length of the block has
been changed. I trust that Bo will log it... ;-)
- jim
At 10:40 AM 12/9/99 -0800, you wrote:
Hi Ted
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Therefore,
it would make it difficult to implement if the REBOL scripter said something
like text="red" print "Hello" as REBOL won't know which color is (or if any are)
mapped to red.
Why not let the color mapping be down a path from the 'system object?
On 10-Dec-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, not PDF. Not everyone has PDF capabilities. Perhaps ASCII,
or RTF
if you need formatting, many word processors accept RTF.
Please, not RTF. Not everyone has RTF capabilities. (I for one
haven't
found an editor on Linux that understood RTF
Hi Elan,
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Ingo,
Please, not RTF. Not everyone has RTF capabilities. (I for one haven't
found an editor on Linux that understood RTF _AND_ was worth having around.)
How about Postscript, then? Or just the all-in-one-html?
Have you tried
Hi Robert,
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Might this be something you could do in a browser via CGI?
Hi, I thought about this too (to use a Browser) but the problem is that a
browser works page-oriented and you don't have access to the 'cursor'
location. So to change the
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Well, let's see what we would need for a GUI function collection (just add
what's missing):
1. Write a rectangular-block of data to a specific x,y coordinate, where
content is rolled-out to the right and down. Refinement of this function
Hello,
On 01-Dec-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to open multiple rebol shells on the Mac?
--- end of quote ---
You would probably need to make multiple copies of the application itself.
What, Mac can't run multiple instances of a single
--- You wrote:
What, Mac can't run multiple instances of a single executable? Are you
talking about multiple copies on the HD like Rebol, Rebol1, Rebol2, etc.?
Sounds limiting.
--- end of quote ---
Keep in mind, the mac is a bit (!) more document-centric than other platforms. In
that
Hello Ted,
Here's something else that I find confusing:
list: [ 1 2 3 4 ]
== [ 1 2 3 4 ]
list2: next list
== [ 2 3 4 ]
clear list
== []
list2:
== [ 2 3 4 ]
next list2:
** Script Error: Out of Range or Past End
About every other operation I try with list2 errors. Exceptions
Hi Eric,
Empty? isn't a synonym for tail?, as far as I know. Your example is a weird
construction, because if I try to test empty? with tail I do this:
test: [1 2 3]
== [1 2 3]
tail test
== []
empty? test
== false
Why do you do:
test-block: tail [1 2 3 4 5]
It strikes me strange to
21 matches
Mail list logo
