Mutable/immutable Rebol values.
Adding a correction and examples how you can change the state of
mutables.
The relations:
mutable = series
immutable = scalar
are pure coincidence, because you can have immutable series and
mutable scalars. It is simply a matter of preferences of the
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 05-Gen-00, you wrote:
l error ; mutable
How can you change an error?
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
o) .-^-. (--o
| Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila |
| GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ /
Here's an idea for extending the parse dialect:
words: make block! 10
== []
string-rule: ["str" skip "ng" [alpha | none]]
== ["str" skip "ng" [alpha | none]]
parse/all "An example string, a strong man, a strange day." extended [
[any [
[to-block string-rule copy word string-rule
[
Can you provide a definition of mutable and immutable, Ladislav, and
explain why it's important.
If a word is protected, is it then suddenly immutable, or is it a
deeper question than that?
-Ted.
Hi, Ted, Ladislav, and all...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide a definition of mutable and immutable, Ladislav, and
explain why it's important.
I think I'm to blame for introducing the word "immutable" into this
thread, so I'll throw in my understanding. The specifications for
On 1/6/2000 at 9:24 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: {{
The specifications for
other languages, such as Python, specifically state that certain
data types are immutable, in the sense that one cannot modify a
value, but only construct a new one.
}}
So in terms of Pascal and C, "constants" would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/2000 at 9:24 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: {{
The specifications for
other languages, such as Python, specifically state that certain
data types are immutable, in the sense that one cannot modify a
value, but only construct a new one.
}}
So in terms of
Hi Eric, 5-Jan-2000 you wrote:
[...]
I think backtracking is an essential part of regular expressions. To quote
from Mastering Regular Expressions by Jeffrey Friedl (O'Reilly, p. 102),
The essence of an NFA engine [the regex matching engine of the kind
that Perl uses] is this: it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric, 5-Jan-2000 you wrote:
[...]
I think backtracking is an essential part of regular expressions. To quote
from Mastering Regular Expressions by Jeffrey Friedl (O'Reilly, p. 102),
The essence of an NFA engine [the regex matching engine of the kind
Get message number 38514 from SELMA or read it at rebol.org:
http://www.rebol.org/userlist/archive/38/514.html
Sterling
I have searched the mailing list for PWS and CGI and even Microsoft...but
have not found information on setting up Rebol to work (cgi) with Personal
Web Server?
Can
Dear REBOL Developers,
I am writing to you all because you are software
developers.
I am reactivating my
programmer days from years back and getting into scripting for the
Internet. I have been evaluating languages by going through the tutors and
have decided for sure I'll use REBOL
Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there
be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former...
ME TOO.
Elliott
On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I also want to be part of the team
My
plan is to release a beta by mid-January
Hello,
I am working on setting up a secure and fast enironment for offering REBOL
virtual hosting for those who would be interested. We plan on offerring
access to REBOL via basic CGI access and offering access to use the Apache
module once its fully released. Is there anything (serious
Not sure, but maybe http://www.owlnet.net provides this type of service
or knows of someone who does.
On 6-Jan-2000/17:08:26-7:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0026_01BF5868.A5394460
Content-Type: text/plain;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if path! is really immutable, or whether something else is
going on, like its range of valid values is restrained.
Based on the following...
p: make path! [a b c d e f]
== a/b/c/d/e/f
type? p/3
== word!
p/3: make word! "yow"
==
Yes! As long as they have the same subject, I'll find them all, and we will send you
REBOL/View. Just as soon as we've got it.
-Carl
At 1/6/00 05:58 PM -0600, you wrote:
Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there
be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message
Yes. This would be useful, and I have been thinking about adding it for many months.
Do you think it is better as:
thru ["a" | "b" | "c"]
The first match is the winner.
-Carl
At 1/6/00 11:04 PM +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
would it be usefull to have 'first available to parse? I just can't
OK. me too.
I think there would be very few of us here who wouldn't want to give a try.
;-)
Also what's the status with REBOL/Command?
Cheers,
Allen K
Thanks Carl for helping us make our computers useful tools again.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would using 'any or 'all be of use here?
parse str ["sometext" [thru "a" | thru "b" | thru "c"] to end]
Something like this:
parse str ["sometext" any [thru "a" thru "b" thru "c"] to end]
do you mean extension of current 'some and 'any words functionality? I
I would also like to test drive the beta
Cheers
colinb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, is Rebol keeping count of all these "me too" messages, or will there
be a "go here for the Rebol/view beta" message later? If the former...
ME TOO.
Hey, one copy to Czech Republic, please :-)
20 matches
Mail list logo
