[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:(5)

1999-11-26 Thread giesse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... You should be able to find the messages on rebol.org; the subject was "Context" or perhaps "REBOL contexts"... BTW, I'm sorry I didn't have the time to dig back those messages in the last days. Most of them are in the first thread

[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:(4)

1999-11-22 Thread joel . neely
"... FYI, when I tried to do the above search, I got a result of: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [REBOL] Pros and cons Re: --- 21-Nov-1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [REBOL] Prose and cons --- 20-Nov-1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [REBOL] Re: Pros and cons Re:(2) --- 21-Nov-1999

[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:

1999-11-21 Thread lmecir
John said: Ok, here is what's at the top of my REBOL wish list: 1. Documentation of the scoping model. ... (rest snipped) I think, there is a help for you with that one... By scope rules are meant the rules the Rebol interpreter follows to resolve the word's binding. The simplest but

[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:(2)

1999-11-20 Thread wwink2
I would also appreciate seeing this. Either the id's of the old messages, the search keywords that will get them , or a good summary. Thanks. On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, you wrote: Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! On 19-Nov-99, you wrote: a I looked through the archive and couldn't find a formal

[REBOL] pros and cons. Re:(2)

1999-11-20 Thread rryost
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 5:55 PM Subject: [REBOL] pros and cons. Re: Hey now, pilgrim. You can call me guru, or you can call me goof ball, but don't call me Sherman! ;-) Triple howdy, and two pilgrims, O REBOL guru. [ . . . ] Jeff said:

[REBOL] Pros and cons Re:

1999-01-17 Thread jeff
And a double howdy back to you too, pilgrim!: Well, howdy back, pardner! [ . . . ] ... but look at the way REBOL encourages use of the basic REBOL datatype, the block. Commands such as APPEND, INSERT, REMOVE, CHANGE, CLEAR, POKE, REPLACE, REVERSE, SORT, are

[REBOL] pros and cons. Re:

1999-01-17 Thread jeff
Hey now, pilgrim. You can call me guru, or you can call me goof ball, but don't call me Sherman! ;-) Triple howdy, and two pilgrims, O REBOL guru. [ . . . ] Jeff said: Your aim is to bash REBOL for it's lack of functional purity, no? :-)

[REBOL] Pros and cons. Re:

1999-01-16 Thread jeff
Howdy a142808: Jeff said: REBOL is a free form context sensitive first class functional language with prototyped based objects and cloning. It offers both static and lexical scoping, From what I can tell REBOL is quasi-statically