[REBOL] Endless looping processes. Re:(8)

2000-05-17 Thread fred-ml
Hello s, Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 3:19:18 PM, you wrote: shc There are 2 exe's on the NT Server 4.0 Resource kit cd called (i think) shc tlist.exe and kill.exe. Run tlist.exe from the command line, which will give shc you a list of running processes and an ID. Then run kill.exe XXX where XXX

[REBOL] load/next - bug?! Re:(6)

2000-05-17 Thread lmecir
Hi, just my two cents... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest inline-strings and blocks should be read-only, This might be an idea, but then you have more problems when you save and then load strings... No, I don't think this would be a good solution. [...] What's your

[REBOL] emacs colors Re:(4)

2000-05-17 Thread fred-ml
Hello sterling, Tuesday, May 16, 2000, 7:15:44 PM, you wrote: src print emacs-mode: read http://www.rebol.org/rebol.el Thank you. Now I'm not this good at emacs, the program is very good, but i cannot figure out where to put the rebol.el file and how to include/start it in emacs. I tried:

[REBOL] Timeouts. Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread agem
Dear Rebolers, seems there's some demand for a timeout, may I suggest to make it possible to snap in a user defined function that'll be called when the timeout occurs? This would make it possible to end the program controlled, of course you'll have to pay attention not to start the

[REBOL] Question on Secure (repost) Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread agem
do compose/deep[secure[(my-dir) allow]] attention to the 'level in secure, this means, the compose is not evaluatet! you have to hack a bit more :) source secure secure: native [ {Specify security policies (access levels and directories). Return prior settings.} 'level [word! block!]

[REBOL] load/next - bug?! Re:(7)

2000-05-17 Thread agem
Hi, just my two cents... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest inline-strings and blocks should be read-only, This might be an idea, but then you have more problems when you save and then load strings... No, I don't think this would be a good solution.

[REBOL] Question on Secure (repost) Re:(3)

2000-05-17 Thread Al . Bri
Hi, Volker. Call me idiot, but I didn't understand what you're trying to say here: do compose/deep[secure[(my-dir) allow]] attention to the 'level in secure, this means, the compose is not evaluatet! you have to hack a bit more :) source secure secure: native [ {Specify security

[REBOL] apache?

2000-05-17 Thread etcha
do i need to have apache/rebol to use rebol? as i am unable to get core working to display simple cgi. i have set permissions. is there anything i am looking out for? etcha

[REBOL] load/next - bug?! Re:(9)

2000-05-17 Thread Petr . Krenzelok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, [...] BTW, how about a link to the creation-point of a value? this would help me, i often have this "you need a block here!" and have to look around where the var is assigned, especially when using locals (no good look-in). Exec-Lists had such a

[REBOL] stack space Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread mjelinek
Oops, yes this was a bug, now fixed. The reason I jumped to conclusions was because I ran out of stack space once with REBOL on the Amiga and it clearly WASN'T a bug (the same program ran on NT without error). As I said, on the Amiga it was easy to increase the stack size and the program ran

[REBOL] emacs colors Re:(5)

2000-05-17 Thread sterling
Here's what I've got... The first line insures that where I put my rebol.el file is in the load path, it loads the file, requires it (whatever that's worth I don't know exactly), then adds the hook and associates .r files. (setq load-path (cons "/usr/lib/xemacs/site-lisp" load-path)) (load

[REBOL] emacs colors Re:(5)

2000-05-17 Thread jeff
Howdy, Fredrik ( and other brothers and sisters of the EMACS faith (-: ): Okay, you may want to byte-compile the file first: M-x byte-compile-file This will produce "rebol.elc". Then you might put this in your home directory. You may need to add your home

[REBOL] Re: rebol ecommerce site Re:

2000-05-17 Thread collins-e
On 17-May-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said about the subject [REBOL] rebol ecommerce site Re:: Hi, very cool...REBOL View and Command will make this much easier and more comprehensive for you in the near future...we're plugging away! dan Thanks. Rebol/Command will certainly be of benefit for a

[REBOL] rebol ecommerce site Re:(3)

2000-05-17 Thread rrm
I just want to tell you how impressed I am with your work. The site looks great and the total use of REBOL is awesome. I was wondering if your content is store in a database or flat file. How did you deal with REBOL's data limitations? -Original Message- Anyone else have any comments

[REBOL] Re: data storage (was: [REBOL] rebol ecommerce site Re:(3))

2000-05-17 Thread RChristiansen
This subject brings something else to mind I would like to share... I am looking forward to REBOL/Command in the hopes that the BeOS version will support read/write access to extended BeOS File System attributes. Extended BFS attributes are a simple, reliable way to store and retrieve data in

[REBOL] Re: rebol ecommerce site Re:(3)

2000-05-17 Thread collins-e
On 17-May-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said about the subject [REBOL] rebol ecommerce site Re:(3): Hi, I just want to tell you how impressed I am with your work. The site looks Thanks. great and the total use of REBOL is awesome. I was wondering if your content is store in a database or flat

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings

2000-05-17 Thread tim
Hi: I have written a function to find the matching index for a character in a string: ;code follows: char-pos: func [str[string!] ch[char!] /local result] [ result: find/case str ch either equal? result none [return 0] [return index? find/case str ch] ] ;I have had to use find/case

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread mjelinek
Not being used to the any/all construct (below) I find it a little hard to read. It does produce terse code, but then the original example could have been shortened up considerably too (if this is all there was to the problem). To solve the problem in the original context, the second 'find (in

[REBOL] Syntax highlighting for GoldED

2000-05-17 Thread weirddream
Hello, when talking about syntax highlighting... is there any syntax highlighting module for Amiga's GoldED? Thanks, Bolek -- --you've been/byl jsi contacted/kontaktovan --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -www.volny.cz/weirddream

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread tim
Thank you Jeff: It works without the redundant call all right Tell me - how r is returned with a specific call to return? Regards Tim P.S. will read Docs on ANY and ALL At 01:18 PM 5/17/00 -0800, you wrote: Howdy Tim: I'm a big fan of ANY and ALL for instance like

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings Re:

2000-05-17 Thread ingo
Hi Tim, this would be my version ... char-pos: func [str[string!] ch[char!] /local result] [ either found? result: find/case str ch [index? result][0] ] regards, Ingo Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi: I have written a

[REBOL] CGI Error

2000-05-17 Thread louisaturk
I'm having trouble getting set up. What is causing the following error message? I it caused by me or my ISP? Many thanks in advance. Louis CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are:

[REBOL] Windows NT 4.0 / Apache / Rebol Configuration

2000-05-17 Thread Jonathan . Saunders
I am running Windows NT 4.0 (I believe with SP5) with Rebol/Core 2.2.0.3.1 (which is the latest version as far as I can tell) and Apache 1.3.9. My goal is to get Rebol running with Apache and CGI. (I figure I should be able to CGI working first before I move on to anything more advanced.) If

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings/Comparing

2000-05-17 Thread tim
Hello You'All: Being my own most demanding critic, I wrote a function to find the matching index of a character in a string. I submitted that function, and have gotten three versions of an improvement upon the algorithm. All are obviously an improvement over mine. I would love to see

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:

2000-05-17 Thread kevin
Louis wrote: CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are: Is your script printing a Content-type header as the first thing it does, followed by a blank line? print "Content-type: text/html^/^/" Kev

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:

2000-05-17 Thread louisaturk
I should have mentioned that I am trying to get the cgiemailer.r script from rebol.com to work. I haven't changed anything except the path in cgiemailer.html. Louis At 06:23 PM 5/17/00 -0500, you wrote: I'm having trouble getting set up. What is causing the following error message? Is it

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread louisaturk
Kev, My last post was directed to you, but I forgot to put your name on it. Sorry. Thanks for the help. Louis At 04:07 PM 5/17/00 -0700, you wrote: Louis wrote: CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread louisaturk
Here's the script: #!rebol -cs REBOL [ Title: "Sends Email via CGI Form" Date: 20-July-1999 File: %cgiemailer.r Purpose: { Uses a Web form to send an email message. } ] print "Content-Type: text/html^/^/" ;-- Required Page Header print

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings/Comparing Re:

2000-05-17 Thread icimjs
Hi Tim, you wrote: [...] I would love to see some input and discussion as to what is the most efficient of the three functions. [...] If you compare char-pos1 to char-pos2 then the only difference is that char-pos2 adds a call to found? to char-pos1. It's probably safe to speculate that

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:

2000-05-17 Thread icimjs
Hi Louis, you wrote: I'm having trouble getting set up. What is causing the following error message? I it caused by me or my ISP? Many thanks in advance. Louis CGI Error The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are:

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:(3)

2000-05-17 Thread icimjs
Hi Louis, a little off-topic, but it is more efficient to collect your output in a string and print the complete string in one go, using a single call to print. Like so: output: make string! 1000 insert output {Content-Type: text/html^/^/ htmlbodyh2Results:/h2} cgi: make system/standard/email

[REBOL] [REBOL]Finding characters in strings/Comparing Re:(2)

2000-05-17 Thread tim
Hey Elan! This is really important info, as far as I am concerned. The side effect is that you also showed me how to do simple bench-marking. I had speculated myself that char-pos1 would be the fastest. Thanks, and good luck with the book! Tim At 04:53 PM 5/17/00 -0700, you wrote: Hi Tim,

[REBOL] Suppressing == false Re:

2000-05-17 Thread tim
Hello: Frequently when I use rebol code that evaluates a condition, the interpreter spits out == false I'd like to be able to suppress that. I've got a basic template to trap error messages. It goes like this (complements of other list members): if error? set/any 'err try [ print "yes" ] [

[REBOL] CGI Error Re:(3)

2000-05-17 Thread news . ted
print "/bodyhtml" This should be /html - but that would not have caused the error you reported. Here's a generic email script that I've been using. The form uses the same variable names you see here (TO, FROM, SUBJECT). Note that you can add variables in the form, and REBOL will automatically

[REBOL] read-io

2000-05-17 Thread max
Can anyone tell me what it means when read-io returns -1? Thanks, Max

[REBOL] Question on Secure (repost) Re:(4)

2000-05-17 Thread mdb
Not sure what to say, Andrew. Don't take this personally but your solutions didn't work whereas Volker's did. Yours: downloaddir: %/d/anti%20virus%20downloads/ == %/d/anti%20virus%20downloads/ secure compose [(downloaddir) allow] ** Script Error: Invalid argument: compose. ** Where: secure

[REBOL] Question on Secure (repost) Re:(5)

2000-05-17 Thread Al . Bri
Mike wrote: Not sure what to say, Andrew. Don't take this personally but your solutions didn't work whereas Volker's did. I won't take it tooo personally. I can call my self an idiot for not checking it? :-) 'source doesn't evaluate it's argument. I didn't check for that. :-( source