> Dear Rebolers, > > seems there's some demand for a timeout, may I > suggest to make it possible to snap in a user > defined function that'll be called when the > timeout occurs? This would make it possible to > end the program controlled, of course you'll > have to pay attention not to start the next > loop there ... > Should help much. normaly there is a stable base and a new feature, and this kills the programm? the timeout-code would be the first thing good tested. and short. [write error, quit] :) with something like an error-message (where it was) as arg? Volker > > regards, > > Ingo > > > Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Dear Rebol-list, > > > > Hello, I'm having some problems with my Rebol processes, quite often I > > end up with a endless process, taking about 30% of the CPU. > > > > Shouldn't there be the possibility to set some kind of timeout? > > > > So the Rebol process will die after a period of seconds that the > > timeout is set to ? > > -- _ . _ > ingo@)|_ /| _| _ <We ARE all ONE www._|_o _ _ ._ _ > www./_|_) |o(_|(/_ We ARE all FREE> ingo@| |(_|o(_)| (_| > http://www.2b1.de/Rebol/ ._| ._| > > >
