Does anyone use alternate style sheets and/or style switchers? If so,
have you found them to be useful?
Yes, I've setup a governmental site that has to be accessible by
incapacitated, that means offering different contrast-styles. So
I decided to offer them as alternate styles as well.
I don't see how a class could describe an element (for UAs, not authors).
If there was a known convention on possible values, then I'd agree to say
that it could convey information (other than style), but AFAIK this is not
the case.
I may be missing something though, so I'd be happy to hear
Web Standards are about catering for the future; it's safe to assume that as
more people get onto the Internet then there ability for using the browser
will improve.
Please show me the statistical proofed concept for that statement.
People get less stupid by using, not by becoming more
None of the messages I receive from this list has a List-Id header.
Either it's not being sent, or it's being stripped out somewhere on its
travels.
I don't receive it either, but 'Return-Path' should do:
Return-Path: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
It's unlikely to get this by PM. :)
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
... although I think it has a depth limit (you could install a local
copy and remove that limit though.
My little Problem with it, is that it moans about the XHTML DTD:
The WDG validator can work recursively:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/
My little Problem with it, is that it moans about the XHTML DTD:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd, line 237,
character 28: omitted tag minimization parameter can be omitted only
if
I am thinking about what would be the best way to do syntax highlighting
of PHP-code.
If one considers how PHP:s own syntax highlight function works, it
produces a mess of inline-styles (or font-tags for the poor ones still
doing PHP 4). See http://se.php.net/highlight_string
See also
The only other way (in my scenario) is to add a transparent image 'over'
the background to line up with the div - but this is a bit of a
'fudge' and
seems a shame when there is code to do the job.
Do you know why it isn't valid?
No idea. Opera and Safari support the CSS3 recommendation,
!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//ES
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
EN is the language the DTD is written in, not the the document. That
Doctype is just wrong.
Hmm, what's the difference? ENTITY being ENTIDAD?
I guess it's some left-over
I note that you did mention an SGML parser in your message -
was that relevant? (IE, Firefox, Safari are not SGML parsers.)
Hmm, it was only meant as hint, that HTML was born out of SGML,
and there is a plenty of (completely useless and missleading)
conventions and definitions from
Please name me a reason why that is invalid!
OK, this falls under the heading of SGML stuff that doesn't matter
unless you start playing with non-standard code, and I don't mess
with that sort of thing, but I think:
If you serve it with an XML content-type, it should AFAIK, be fine. If
I am thankful for any tip, but my question was not about how I should go
about implementing the highlighting in PHP. My question is what would be
the best possible markup in the result, semantically speaking.
...
The makers of HTML did some groundwork. They gave us the tags var,
code,
Anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts or speculation about this?
I much agree with this:
http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/
[and I AM a computer-junkie who loves math and science, but more so
I'm humanist (- accessability, and I love to see my Grand-Ma reading
my blog) and
having a go trying to help a friend figure out why, in xhtml strict 1.0 the
br / that are styled in the css style sheet as follows: .sidemenu br
{line-height: 3px; .
However in FF, Netscape and Mozilla it would appear the css style is being
ignored. The space is too high
IE and
From D-Lib Magazine, v.12(11), 2006:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson.html
Excellent.
Indeed:
... The logical step [of MicroFormats to de-centralize behaviour
and appearance of tag-groups] - to add semantic in any
way
I would love to hear of other well-printed sites though. I strongly
believe in css for print but have seen far too few good examples of it.
You may try http://grupoamnet.net. You may even select the print-style
as alternate style-sheet in FireFox.
Ciao
Niels
16 matches
Mail list logo
