I do not agree.
The VISUAL impact or VISUAL meaning should be added by CSS. If you need
italicized text, you´ll be probally trying to add some emphasis or
differentiation in the page. Why should we hide this from our NON-VISUAL
friends?
Legitimate i , it´s the same of legitimate font. It´s the
Just one more thing:
For language purposes, there is always the lang attribute. It can be added
to a meaningless element, like span. The W3C recommends this kind of
approach.
Ok, ok. So, the browsers don´t understand that yet. But it´s always better
to use EM over I and STRONG over B.
--
Usually I set the container element to position:relative, and the
container´s links to position:static . It works fine.
Geoff Pack escreveu:
Thanks guys, all fixed now.
Just seeing that it was possible was enough to make me to strip it back
and start again. The problem was that I had an
Look at http://www.tsa.ind.br
they have print styles, and also a php print preview, using the print CSS.
Barney Carroll escreveu:
CK wrote:
Hi,
After browsing some favored CSS sites, some by Standards Evangelist,
there seems to be a decline in the use of print styles. Has some
movement
The print preview uses my print styles...but some users don´t even look
at it, because of the page´s colours and images.
:D
Thierry Koblentz escreveu:
Look at http://www.tsa.ind.br
they have print styles, and also a php print preview, using the print
CSS.
I did that on my site years ago
of credits for the site. Can I offer any help? If yes, just ask me!
Best Regards,
Raphael Martins
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
