sheredom wrote:
Yeah indeed - its not a clang 17 regression. It's a _clang 16_ regression. At
the minute we're holding our internal compiler toolchain on clang 16, and for
our users we've got to special case disable the warning entirely for clang 17.
https://github.com/sheredom edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84912
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/sheredom created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84912
…field (#74512)
Shadowing warning doesn't make much sense since field is not available in
lambda's body without capturing this.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71976
>From
https://github.com/sheredom milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84912
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits