[llvm-branch-commits] [LoongArch][Codegen] Add support for TLSDESC (PR #90159)

2024-04-26 Thread Xi Ruoyao via llvm-branch-commits
xry111 wrote: > > > [wangleiat](https://github.com/wangleiat) wants to merge 1 commit into > > > [users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1) > > > from > >

[llvm-branch-commits] [LoongArch][Codegen] Add support for TLSDESC (PR #90159)

2024-04-26 Thread Xi Ruoyao via llvm-branch-commits
xry111 wrote: > [wangleiat](https://github.com/wangleiat) wants to merge 1 commit into > [users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1) > from >

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [llvm][LoongArch] Improve loongarch_lasx_xvpermi_q instrinsic (#82984) (PR #83540)

2024-03-06 Thread Xi Ruoyao via llvm-branch-commits
xry111 wrote: I have some doubt about this change. To me if the user requests `xvpermi.q` via the `loongarch_lasx_xvpermi_q` intrinsic, we should give her/him the `xvpermi.q` instruction. If (s)he is passing an invalid operand then (s)he is invoking the undefined behavior herself/himself