log4j 1.3 packaging

2003-06-24 Thread Paul Smith
In an effort to get the size of the log4j.jar core file down, is there some more breaking apart we can do? Scott's done a lot of work in the XML JDK 1.4 receiving, but perhaps they could be in a utility jar along with some others? (sort of like Ant's option.jar). cheers,

Re: log4j 1.3 packaging

2003-06-24 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Breaking log4j.jar to too many pieces will result in confusion. Also note that both ant.jar and option.jar are over 600Kb each. Having said that, if we can define a good separation with log4j.jar and option.jar, then why not. But there is also advantage in having a single, albeit large, jar

Re: log4j 1.3 packaging

2003-06-24 Thread Raymond DeCampo
My vote would be for a build that includes the jar file as it is now and another jar file containing the minimal set of classes. If a developer is interested in keeping the jar file size down he or she would probably not be intimidated by having to pick and choose appenders to add to the