.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 7:55 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Questions on initial log4j instance
Howdy,
Where did you see the transient one?
The perfect syntax depends on your usage of the Logger
At 04:58 PM 9/29/2003 +0800, Yu Xiang Xi (Maveo) wrote:
I have seen different usage of initial log4j instance like below
private final static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(some.name);
looks good.
and
private final transient static Logger logger =
Logger.getLogger(some.name);
the
on initial log4j instance
At 04:58 PM 9/29/2003 +0800, Yu Xiang Xi (Maveo) wrote:
I have seen different usage of initial log4j instance like below
private final static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(some.name);
looks good.
and
private final transient static Logger logger
Do you mean 'volatile' here? I can't find in the JLS where transient
has this affect. It wouldn't be the first time I've looked for
something in the JLS and not found it, though.
-Kevin
--- Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover, in addition to serialization aspects, the keyword
Yes, of course 'volatile' not 'transient'.
I somehow merged volatile and transient in my mind.
At 09:50 AM 9/29/2003 -0700, Kevin Klinemeier wrote:
Do you mean 'volatile' here? I can't find in the JLS where transient
has this affect. It wouldn't be the first time I've looked for
something in
