RE : log4j and WSAD 5.0 anomalies and problems - Final Anwser

2003-04-01 Thread pelletiere
Hi, I got the similar problem of you and I finally discover what is the problem. First I use wsad 5.0 and use the express server that is built in wsad 5.0. So your problem is not using log4j but log4j with commons-loggins.jar. When you call private static Log log =

Chainsaw status

2003-04-01 Thread Tauzell, Dave
Hi, Is anybody working on/maintaining Chainsaw? I'd like to use it with the SocketHubAppender. I have downloaded some modifications to allow use of the SocketHubAppender that I found in an old post but that doesn't seem to be part of the latest release. -Dave

RE: Chainsaw status

2003-04-01 Thread Mark Womack
Yep. In fact changes have just recently been made in the current cvs version to support the new receiver framework. This will allow it to work with SocketHubAppender, JMSAppender, or any appender that has a matching receiver. Configuration of Chainsaw is now handled via the normal log4j xml

thanks

2003-04-01 Thread Erik Price
Hi, As someone who has made quite a bit of use of print statements to track execution through code, and then hates to go back and remove those print statements, I just want to say thanks to those who have developed log4j and added it to the Jakarta project so that others (me) can make use of

RE: thanks

2003-04-01 Thread Lutz Michael
Agreed!!! -Original Message- From: Erik Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:01 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: thanks Hi, As someone who has made quite a bit of use of print statements to track execution through code, and then hates to go back and

RE: Chainsaw status

2003-04-01 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 01:51 PM 4/1/2003 -0800, you wrote: It is still alpha, but you could try building the current cvs and giving it a try. Ceki, et al, I know there is no definitive deadline for v1.3, and I think it is still early, but I wonder if we should consider doing an alpha build at some point? Something