I have seen a Java file that provides that functionality somewhere in
the documentation, website, code. I don't remember where I saw it so
you may ahve to dig a bit.
On Apr 11, 2005 5:30 PM, Neil Benn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for asking such a basic question but I
At 08:25 PM 4/12/2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I didn't update all copies... I didn't realize I had to as I thought the
version local to the webapp would be all that matters (is this by any
chance the much-discussed autodiscovery/classloader issue rearing its ugly
head??)
If I am not mistaken, by
I didn't update all copies... I didn't realize I had to as I thought the
version local to the webapp would be all that matters (is this by any
chance the much-discussed autodiscovery/classloader issue rearing its ugly
head??)
I also did not update commons-logging-api.jar as I don't have that
insta
Frnak,
Did you make sure to upgrade *all* copies of commons-logging.jar to 1.0.4?
I believe Websphere has its own copy of JCL. Did you make sure also to
upgrade commons-logging-api.jar?
At 07:49 PM 4/12/2005, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Further info...
I updated JCL to 1.0.4 and removed the
org.apa
Further info...
I updated JCL to 1.0.4 and removed the
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory file... logging broke again. I put
the file back, restarted the app, and logging was once again working.
Log4J version is 1.2.8 incidentally, so I was almost up to date with that
as well (have NOT update
Hi Ceki,
I am using an older version, but not *that* old... 1.0.3
Would you expect that upgrading from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4 (the latest production
release I can see) and also removing the
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory file would result in my logging
still working as it does now with that file?
Frank,
What you suggest sounds quite wrong to me. In particular,
org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4jFactory is deprecated [1] and should
not be used. The fact that setting org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
gives positive results indicates that you may be using an old version of
JCL as Jam
Thanks James, that did put me on the right track... just for the sake of
having an answer in the archives, what solved the problem for me is adding
the following file...
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
...(yes, that is the full filename!), with the contents...
org.apache.commons.logging.im
Tested and confirmed, thanks Curt!
This was exactly what I was looking for (and a single prop file is
fine).
-D
> -Original Message-
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:39 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Multiple loggers, same appl
Hi Bender,
Three different Loggers, each with their own Appenders as configured
(preferably) through separate property files. Utilize standard appenders
as configured. I'll rename 'ErrorLogger' to 'CodeLogger' to avoid
confusion.
i.e.
AuditLogger configured through securitylog.properties
--append
You may need to tweak this for your own requirements. Almost all of
the log4j examples demonstrate using classnames for logger names,
however this is a case where you would want to use a slightly different
pattern. Hopefully, you have read
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/manual.html and
Darren
you must make more clear what you want to achieve:
Do you want only three different destinations (appenders) to log to?
Or do you want three different loggers, each one with his own set of appenders?
What is the kind of the desired appenders?
How do you want to distinguish the different lo
Hi Jacob, thanks for the reply.
I tried your suggestion but the problem persisted. Like you (and James,
thanks for your comment btw) I reckoned that there was a problem with
Tomcat as it obviously wasn't starting up, however I had the cause down
to Log4j because that was where it was sticking and
Hey all,
Having a real hard time finding any information regarding my problem.
I have an application, and within each class I would like to configure
three separate Loggers, each having their own severitys:
SecurityLogger
ErrorLogger
AuditLogger
But, I would like each of these loggers to have
That sounds similar to a problem that I had recently. Search the
archives for messages with a subject of "JCL+Tomcat+Log4j related
problems". Basically I was having problems because my JCL jars were
too old.
On Apr 12, 2005 9:03 AM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm
Hi all,
I'm having an odd little problem here...
I have a webapp where I use Log4J underneath JCL. I use an XML config
file and Log4J is initialized in a ServletContextListener. The code in
the listener does some hackery on the XML... basically, I construct a real
path to my log files on the fl
Hello,
Thanks for your answer, i will try your trick.
In any case, your explanation i useful !
Antoine
-Message d'origine-
De : Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 8 avril 2005 16:49
A : Log4J Users List
Objet : Re: Date in French
I assume that your default locale
Hi all,
following is the typical call stack when calling log4j's isDebugEnabled:
+-> log.isDebugEnabled()
+-> repository.isDisabled()
+-> this.getEffectiveLevel()
+-> level.isGreaterOrEqual()
Seems pretty heavy load for me (when debugging disabled).
This is only because repository.isDis
18 matches
Mail list logo