Hi everybody.
I'm searching for a logging API for Java and found log4j. Sine the new 2.x
version is marked as beta, I doubt it is save to use in a production system?!
Should I prefer to use the old 1.x version?
Best regards
Max Senft
We just put it in production. Seems fine.
We are not doing anything fancy though.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Max Senft m...@senft-net.com wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm searching for a logging API for Java and found log4j. Sine the new 2.x
version is marked as beta, I doubt it is save to
Please notice, the successor for log4j is logback. Log4j2 is an independent
solution.
Ulrich
Am 17.04.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Mikhail Kruk mes...@gmail.com:
We just put it in production. Seems fine.
We are not doing anything fancy though.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Max Senft
Since I currently do not use any logging API I don't really care about a
successor. But: since the name of log4j 2.x is the same as log4j 1.x
(obviously), this is the successor to me and for a lot of other people on the
net. I know of the other projects, though.
Regards,
Max
Not that I am aware of. If the web app is using the log4j 2 web module to
initialize and destroy its context I would expect this to work.
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Fabien Sanglard wrote:
It seems there is an issue with log4j 2 not closing the core JAR handle on
Windows.
It
Is anybody able to reproduce this on Windows?
Fabien
On 4/17/2013 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Not that I am aware of. If the web app is using the log4j 2 web module to
initialize and destroy its context I would expect this to work.
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Fabien Sanglard wrote:
* why would a lib log4j or any other read its own jar? unless its to get
to a xml for config in it and is not closing it?
* i would never install to program files as there are permission issues
on those folders especially with windows 7 try install on c:\apps\ (make
apps as a new folder)
On
