RE: [jira] Created: (LOG4NET-195) Log4Net Performance comparison with other logging utility

2009-02-04 Thread Walden H. Leverich
Ashish, While I applaud your efforts I've got some points that may call into question the performance differences: 1) I only see debug directories, not release. Performance testing a debug build is silly, there are optimizations that the compiler and JIT ignore in debug that can make a huge

[jira] Commented: (LOG4NET-195) Log4Net Performance comparison with other logging utility

2009-02-04 Thread Ron Grabowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12670533#action_12670533 ] Ron Grabowski commented on LOG4NET-195: --- Wow, that's some interesting code. Let me

Re: [jira] Commented: (LOG4NET-195) Log4Net Performance comparison with other logging utility

2009-02-04 Thread Ron Grabowski
Here's are some intentionally dubious micro-benchmarks showing how to get more bang-for-the-buck out of DateTime.Now in a tight loop. The cached DateTime implementations are about 40% faster than the typical DateTime.Now. Internally log4net uses DateTime.Now when creating a new LoggingEvent.