-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:16 AM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: abandoned?
On 2010-05-03, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
But as long there are no breaking API changes needed to get log4net
running
: abandoned?
You're right. But for now I would leave out the generics. It is likely
more urgent that log4net works with .NET 4.0 right now because a lot of
people (like us) plan a UI rewrite with XAML in the next few months. I
sense this as the main stream of .NET in the near future
want to
support 1.1 anymore we can start to migrate the code to generics and target
.NET 2.0 as the base.
From: Kirill Temnenkov kirill.temnen...@gmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thu, April 29, 2010 6:45:48 AM
Subject: abandoned?
Hi!
I
I agree with getting out a small point release before a large refactor.
- Original Message
From: steven higgan steven.hig...@gmail.com
To: Log4NET Dev log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sun, May 2, 2010 10:03:47 PM
Subject: Re: abandoned?
yes please, drop 1.1 - its so 7 or so
On 2010-05-03, Ron Grabowski rongrabow...@yahoo.com wrote:
I agree with getting out a small point release before a large refactor.
+1
You may even consider to change the major version with the refactoring,
i.e. release a 1.1 compatible log4net 1.2.x soon and call the .NET 2.0+
version log4net
Hi!
I think that the project be abandoned. Am I right?
Can I participate in the development as a developer?
WBR,
Kirill Temnenkov
