On 2016-10-03, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Just curious if anyone has any feedback?
I think I've written this before, but in case I haven't:
Whether a port of log4j 2.x will happen depends on whether people show
up who want to do the porting work. This hasn't happened, yet.
Cheers
Stefan
Thanks for the reply.
I'm not looking for anyone to give me reasons to go with log4net, I have
already made that decision. Since it seems there's interest as of late to find
more resources to provide enhancements to log4net I wanted to voice my concern
over diverging from log4j(2). As I
One thing to note is that the development of a stable logging framework
is rather slow. I would not want the most stable (in regards of features
and API) part of a software to need regular updates. This is one of the
main reasons why we mainly focus on stability issues. The lack of
manpower
