Hi fellows!

This is a call for opinions.

What does the community think should happen? Are there people out there who
use log4net-logviewer or any of its binaries?

Cheers,
Dominik


On 6 Sep 2017 3:08 p.m., "Oskar Gewalli" <gewa...@gmail.com> wrote:


> On 6 Sep 2017, at 15:03, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-09-06 14:17, Oskar Gewalli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Perhaps it would be better to create a dedicated library to just the
log4net xml parsing? The GUI and CLI tools could then depend on that
package.
>>
>> Since the log parsing parts are much smaller and not very special.
>
> I don't have the insights to be able to comment on this. Would you please
explain the main difference between chainsaw, log2console and
log4net-logviewer?
>

The main benefit of using log4net-logviewer is to use the logparsing
abilities to be able to aggregate and do log statistics from the raw logs.

The GUI and CLI bits can potentially be removed, since there are already
chainsaw and log2console.

>>
>> Best regards from Oskar
>>
>>> On 6 Sep 2017, at 13:54, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Oskar,
>>>
>>> log4net-logviewer is a tool that includes both a command line and a ui
frontend written in wpf/xaml that both can parse logfiles and provide users
a better view on log events. According to the readme this is a alternative
to log2console and chainsaw. I don't like it to have multiple tools that do
the same thing. Would you please explain the main differences between the
projects?
>>>
>>> I further noticed that there are at least a few legal issues like
unclear licensing that would definitely prevent the adoption of the
project. Further I see no personal interest to take over the maintenance of
more projects as that would definitely exceed the spare time I have
available. Therefore it would be great if we could merge the communities to
gain a larger community to maintain all of these projects.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dominik
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-09-06 12:49, Oskar Gewalli wrote:
>>>> We currently have a project on github that might be better if it's
under the stewardship of apache (since apache owns log4net)
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/wallymathieu/log4net-logviewer/issues/7#i
ssuecomment-327421829 <https://github.com/wallymathi
eu/log4net-logviewer/issues/7#issuecomment-327421829>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards from Oskar Gewalli
>





-- 
Dominik Psenner

Reply via email to