On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:36:12PM -0300, Hernan Lopes wrote:
sorry i meant 1 thing on the left and one thing on the right. Both are
lists and should be the same size.
Since when? Both:
my ($a, $b) = (1);
and
my ($a, $b) = (1, 2, 3);
are fine.
On 7/30/13, Hernan Lopes
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:23:40 +0100
Hakim Cassimally hakim.cassima...@gmail.com wrote:
As it happens, Perl *can* do destructuring bind. You want parentheses
around the list though:
Incidentally, that's not a destructuring bind, it's just a
list-assignment. A full destructuring bind is
it should be the same size to do what he wants... otherwise it wont work.
On 7/31/13, Abigail abig...@abigail.be wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:36:12PM -0300, Hernan Lopes wrote:
sorry i meant 1 thing on the left and one thing on the right. Both are
lists and should be the same size.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:04:11PM -0300, Hernan Lopes top-posted:
it should be the same size to do what he wants... otherwise it wont work.
Why should? Perl doesn't require the LHS of an array assignment have the same
number of elements as the RHS, and there are a number of use cases where you
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:04:11PM -0300, Hernan Lopes top-posted:
it should be the same size to do what he wants... otherwise it wont work.
Why should? Perl doesn't require the LHS of an array assignment have the
if you dont understood what i meant, i am not going to explain.
On 7/31/13, Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:04:11PM -0300, Hernan Lopes top-posted:
it should be the same size to do what he wants... otherwise it wont work.
Why should? Perl doesn't require
