On 09/06/2011 15:22, David Matthewman wrote:
On 9 Jun 2011, at 12:10, David Landgren wrote:
On 08/06/2011 15:00, David Matthewman wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 13:17, Tom Hukins wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Abigail wrote:
I'd rather go for sacking people that don't know
I wanted to share this... Some people have no sense of humour. This came
up on the cont...@perl.org queue.
(I shall compose a message saying Acme is fun, etc. etc. Can anyone
point me to other similar Acme modules to put this in context?)
Dear Sir,
Let me begin by saying that I am really
Dan Sugalski wrote:
[...]
There are details in various places, but a good place to start is
www.yapc.org and www.perlfoundation.org, which have information about
holding YAPCs. (It may be a bit tough to find, as I think they're working
on the sites, but it is there) YAPC::NA venue requirements
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Je 2003-09-16 11:32:44 +0100, Michael Stevens skribis:
Can anyone recommend any good software for automated testing of
websites? I'm hoping for something fairly simple that will record usage
of a website in a web-browser, and then can re-run that later and look
for
Jason Clifford wrote:
[...]
You may safely reject any SMTP connection that announces itself this
way (HELO compuserve.com)
Just be sure you only match on compuserve.com as if you match subdomains
you'll be blocking email from a lot of people.
Yes, exactly that. In postfix, one would create a
Tom Hukins wrote:
[...]
Also, I suspect the case for bzip2 becomes stronger in the future.
Assume Moore's Law continues to hold for CPU speed increase. Disk and
memory capabilities increase faster, so none of these things matter as
much as now. Bandwidth increases less rapidly than other
Steve Keay wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:46:09AM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
I propose rejecting non text/plain messages in exim's system filter. The
advantage of this is it is straightforward (and I know how to do it :-),
Why not simply reject senders that are not subscribed to the list
[texte en français en fin de message]
Mark Fowler wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, David Landgren wrote:
Well now that you mention it, since London.pm's home page is only about
six sentences, why isn't it done yet? :)
Waiting on Paul Makepeace. After he donated so much money he should have
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
Come on Michel, you know that I have special powers to make you join *any* thread :)
How come you argue about it here, but not on paris.pm?
I smell a conspiracy. :-)
No, we're still teaching Michel how to use
