* Nigel Rantor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eep. None of my business of course, but that place chongs for the lord.
I am an NW3 resident and it sucketh arse like nobody's business.
If you want mexican in town go to Cafe Pacifico in Covent Garden, best
marguaritas (speelong?) ever.
If
At 23:16 + 2003/08/14, Greg McCarroll wrote:
i can never remember its name, because when i finally get up,
find that someone has replaced my legs with jelly, stagger to the
door and grab business card to remember the place. i find that i
end up with a business card for la perla - an italian.
Title: Message
Hello,
I saw your posting
about this on line and would appreciate the details. I've just started a new job
where I need access a Netscreen VPN from home using my
Powerbook.
Cheers,
MIke
==
Mike Friedman
IT Manager
Alzheimers Assn. of
NorthernCalifornia
2065
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Tom Insam wrote:
At 23:16 + 2003/08/14, Greg McCarroll wrote:
i can never remember its name, because when i finally get up,
find that someone has replaced my legs with jelly, stagger to the
door and grab business card to remember the place. i find that i
end up
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
It seems like if you can get an instance of Access running with the file,
you should be able to use ODBC to extract the data.
Indeed, but that would require running Windows, obtaining a
So lots of people seem to want to go to Cafe Pacifico, and as i
haven't been stupid enough to volunteer for cat herding in sometime
i'll take care of it.
I will be going to Cafe Pacifico on Friday 22nd of August (next
friday), I shall be aiming to sit down at the table for 7pm. If
you would like
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
I'm absolutely sure I have seen a project that is aiming to produce an
open source library for access databases bt for the life of me I can't
find it in any of the usual places.
libmdb?
http://mdbtools.sourceforge.net/
Cheers,
Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:58:44PM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Any success actually having a H1B granted?
I had one during the dot com boom and it was a massive PITA even then.
As a student in the US and then an employee of an American corporation
which sheperded my
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:39:16PM +0100, Ali Young wrote:
I'm starting an OU maths degree next year. This is because free time is
patently evil and wrong and much be got rid of.
Do you actually have any free time at the moment, though? :)
I'm
Hi Everyone
I need a bit of advice with a slightly embarrasing problem... No, not in
the trouser department (as yet).
I have managed to lose some source code (ahem) for a script that I packaged
with perl2exe on a Windows 2000 PC. I have seen a few hints that perl2exe
applications can be cracked
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, James Campbell wrote:
I have managed to lose some source code (ahem) for a script that I packaged
with perl2exe on a Windows 2000 PC. I have seen a few hints that perl2exe
applications can be cracked to reveal the source code. This sound great
except the word trivial
Hello
I have had a good look round at what may be causing the error..
Could not create semaphore set: No space left on device
What I am basically doing is the following...
tie %myhash, 'IPC::Shareable', hashkey, {create = 1, exclusive = 0,
mode = 0666, destroy = 1, size = 262144 };
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:21:34 -0400, Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They swear they're upgrading RSN, when BSD (Free? Open? Whichever.)
does. They only run stable from their distro, and it's hard to fault
an ISP for that.
That's a pretty lame excuse. It's very easy to disable the
This is the output of ipcs -A...
IPC status from running system as of Fri Aug 15 13:10:04 UTC 2003
T ID KEYMODEOWNERGROUP CREATOR
CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIMERTIMECTIME
Message Queues:
T ID KEYMODEOWNER
Actually, $dstIP prints out 10 times. and the maximum number of shares
mem segments is 10.
Maybe its the hash that isn't declared correctly!?
Andy
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:12, Andy Ford wrote:
This is the output of ipcs -A...
IPC status from running system as of Fri Aug 15 13:10:04 UTC 2003
I meant semaphores...
from 'sysdef -i' I get
* IPC Semaphores
*
10 semaphore identifiers (SEMMNI)
60 semaphores in system (SEMMNS)
30 undo structures in system (SEMMNU)
25 max semaphores per id (SEMMSL)
10 max operations per semop call (SEMOPM)
10 max undo
I am getting somewhere now!!
If I call 'tie' after I have created the hash, all is fine.
Surely I should be able to create the shares memory and then add/remove
entries in the hash at will!?
Andy
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:12, Andy Ford wrote:
This is the output of ipcs -A...
IPC status
dha wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:26:18AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
The goods have indeed arrived. I will not take any photos of it. I may
bring[1] it to the next social. It is a black Victoria's Secret bra.
And will you be bringing it on tour for those of us not in the london
area?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:46:50PM +0100, Shevek wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, James Campbell wrote:
I have managed to lose some source code (ahem) for a script that I packaged
with perl2exe on a Windows 2000 PC. I have seen a few hints that perl2exe
applications can be cracked to reveal
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
The goods have indeed arrived. I will not take any photos of it. I may
bring[1] it to the next social. It is a black Victoria's Secret bra.
I'd be *more* than happy to take photographs of you modelling the bra, so
as to let those who can't make it to
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:57:58PM +0100, Marna Gilligan wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
The goods have indeed arrived. I will not take any photos of it. I may
bring[1] it to the next social. It is a black Victoria's Secret bra.
I'd be *more* than happy to take
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
This counts as art rather than debauchery? On the basis that debauchery
is frowned on at social meetings?
Anyway, this seems unlikely, given Leon's previous insistence that he
won't be wearing it.
Count the number of people who pat him on the back
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*
*This counts as art rather than debauchery? On the basis that debauchery
*is frowned on at social meetings?
*
*Anyway, this seems unlikely, given Leon's previous insistence that he
*won't be wearing it.
Gads, given the choice, I'd almost rather have
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Ali Young wrote:
and the number of people who try to ping his bra strap
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ping bra-strap.leon
ping: unknown host bra-strap.leon
Jason
--
UKFSN.ORG Finance Free Software while you surf the 'net
http://www.ukfsn.org/ ADSL Broadband
For various reasons I needed to write something that would evaluate an
arbitary math's expression safely (i.e not just run it through eval ).
So I decided that the best [0] way to do it was to write a grammar.
Which I have. It's quite funky, deals with large floating point numbers,
sin, random
* Elaine -HFB- Ashton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gads, given the choice, I'd almost rather have photos of you all wearing
it on your head Animal House style just to get it over with :) It'd be a
fitting addition to the toilet seat around the neck series
Last time you made a wise crack
* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For various reasons I needed to write something that would evaluate an
arbitary math's expression safely (i.e not just run it through eval ).
you could always just use google, maybe write a screen scraper for,
have you seen the google calculator, its
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 08:15:52AM +, Greg McCarroll said:
you could always just use google, maybe write a screen scraper for,
have you seen the google calculator, its very good ;-)
*slap!*
you could always just use google, maybe write a screen scraper for,
have you seen the google calculator, its very good ;-)
*slap!*
a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:11:21PM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:21:34 -0400, Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They swear they're upgrading RSN, when BSD (Free? Open? Whichever.)
does. They only run stable from their distro, and it's hard to fault
an ISP for
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Simon Wistow wrote:
For various reasons I needed to write something that would evaluate an
arbitary math's expression safely (i.e not just run it through eval ).
So I decided that the best [0] way to do it was to write a grammar.
Which I have. It's quite funky, deals
Lusercop `the.lusercop'@lusercop.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:11:21PM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:21:34 -0400, Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They swear they're upgrading RSN, when BSD (Free? Open? Whichever.)
does. They only run stable from their
* Shevek shevek at anarres.org [2003-08-15 12:39]:
The effective halfway house, which does produce a good but fast
sandbox, is to parse the thing properly, generate a parse tree, then
emit guaranteed clean Perl code from the parse tree, and eval that.
This is how the Template Toolkit does it
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, darren chamberlain wrote:
* Shevek shevek at anarres.org [2003-08-15 12:39]:
The effective halfway house, which does produce a good but fast
sandbox, is to parse the thing properly, generate a parse tree, then
emit guaranteed clean Perl code from the parse tree, and
Shevek wrote:
Yapp is a brilliant piece of code which I love both in architecture and
implementation, but it's desperately fucking slow.
Slow at compiling the grammar or when running the parser that it builds?
For compiling, we don't care that much because we only need to do it once,
or
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Andy Wardley wrote:
Shevek wrote:
Yapp is a brilliant piece of code which I love both in architecture and
implementation, but it's desperately fucking slow.
Slow at compiling the grammar or when running the parser that it builds?
Very slow at running. I don't really
Shevek wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Andy Wardley wrote:
Shevek wrote:
Yapp is a brilliant piece of code which I love both in architecture and
implementation, but it's desperately fucking slow.
Slow at compiling the grammar or when running the parser that it builds?
Very slow at running. I don't
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Werm wrote:
Shevek wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Andy Wardley wrote:
Shevek wrote:
Yapp is a brilliant piece of code which I love both in architecture and
implementation, but it's desperately fucking slow.
Slow at compiling the grammar or when running the parser
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 08:15:34PM +0100, Shevek wrote:
I use bison/flex, as previously mentioned. However, my current release on
CPAN has a bug in it (produced, ironically enough, by following the perlxs
documentation). But I really think that for an LL grammar, you should be
Could you bug
My cow-worker (soon to be my boss) told me of this strange dream he had
last night. Partly it's strange because he's not a perl monger (and in fact,
doesn't even like perl).
Anyway, he dreamt that he was in a group of London Perl mongers arguing
about which pub to meet up in. After some
40 matches
Mail list logo
