Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1241047] Protocol Action: 'IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in PCE discovery' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13.txt)

Hi, It looks OK to me. Thanks! -- “Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno” Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D https://www.linkedin.com/dr2lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com Mobile: +34 682 051 091 - On 21/10/22,

[Lsr] 【Object the update of LSInfinity usage in RFC8362 】Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-07.txt

Object! I have summarized the reason at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/iqcgBvMIPcVxWpfK-AW9MUhpKes/. Please give the reasonable responses before making any unsound attempts. Such updates, implementation and deployment will introduce chaos within the network. Aijun Wang China

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-07.txt

All, Based on the WG Last Call discussion, section 6.4 has been added to clarify base algorithm exclusion in OSPFv3 E-Intra-Area-Prefix-LSAs. Please provide any additional comment before Nov 5, 2022. Thanks, Acee On 10/21/22, 4:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote:

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1241047] Protocol Action: 'IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in PCE discovery' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13.txt)

This looks good to me though I'll defer final approval to the authors. Thanks, Acee On 10/21/22, 1:38 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" wrote: Dear Authors: ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED We've completed the registry actions for the following RFC-to-be:

[Lsr] Datatracker State Update Notice:

IANA action state changed to "Waiting on Authors" Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/ ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

[Lsr] [IANA #1241047] Protocol Action: 'IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in PCE discovery' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13.txt)

Dear Authors: ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED We've completed the registry actions for the following RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13 ACTION 1: We've moved the following registry to the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters grouping at

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ppsenak-lsr-rfc8920bis-02

WG Chairs - I note that the draft is still in Call For Adoption By WG Issued state. ?? I had hoped to be able to request WG Last Call at IETF 115. Is there anything blocking this? Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-02

WG Chairs - I note that the draft is still in Call For Adoption By WG Issued state. ?? I had hoped to be able to request WG Last Call at IETF 115. Is there anything blocking this? Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks Authors : William Britto

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link-00.txt

Hi All, According to discussion of the draft "Advertising Exclusive Links for Flex-Algorithm in IGP" in interim meeting on september, The OSPF problem indeed exists and the solution should not be the same with IS-IS. So, we submit a new draft to solve the OSPF problem, including