Hi guys,
Just noticed a use case that probably wasn't considered before.
If I'm executing LTP interactively and I provide a single-item set
as input into runltp (e.g. -f syscalls instead of -f syscalls,network)
sed/a for-loop gets stuck waiting to process an EOL / EOF.
Not sure what
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
It looks like unconfined_t is not granted setfcap capability. So
when running ltp as unconfined_t, the file capabilities test fails.
I'm just wondering what the right answer is:
1. require running ltp as an administrative type
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:18 -0400, David L Durant (Mags) wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 14:47 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
It looks like unconfined_t is not granted setfcap capability. So
when running ltp as unconfined_t, the
On Mon, 2008-07-07 14:47 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
It looks like unconfined_t is not granted setfcap capability. So
when running ltp as unconfined_t, the file capabilities test fails.
I'm just wondering what the right answer
Hi guys,
I've attached some patches that I created for LTP at work. Most of them
simply add command-line options to specify the amount of memory/pages to
use for tests. However, there's one fix that works around a bug in
uClibc's pthread implementation.
i have deleted that log file...and i used MAY month-08 LTP...these failures
are because of proc/sys/kernel/msgmni file, which is restricted to 16...now
i have changed to 2046 and these test cases are passed.
but still inotify02, message_queue_test_02_ctl, Filecaps tests are failed in
my Linux
Here is the only caveat to the issue. As I have noted in previous
mailing list emails I still have two IPC testcases that fail with the
ltp-full-20080630 release.
- message_queue_test_02_ctl
- message_queue_test_05
So is the current behavior because one of those two tests are failing?
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:19 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi All,
I would like to meet all of you who is attending OLS 2008 summit at
Ottawa. I will be there to present our LTP Paper = Building a Robust
Linux Kernel Piggyback the Linux Test
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 20:41 +0530, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:07:24PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to meet all of you who is attending OLS 2008 summit at
Ottawa. I will be there to present our LTP Paper = Building a Robust
Linux Kernel Piggyback
Hi Stephen, Sergei David,
Can you kindly provide review comments for this LTP-SELinux patch from
Ramon.
Regards--
Subrata
Forwarded Message
From: Ramon de Carvalho Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH]
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:14 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, what policy version?
selinux-policy-3.3.1-72.fc9.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-72.fc9.noarch
selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-72.fc9.noarch
Is that what you want to know?
Ok,
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 17:53 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Stephen, Sergei David,
Can you kindly provide review comments for this LTP-SELinux patch from
Ramon.
I don't test on RHEL 4, so I can't speak to how well it works there.
But it causes no regressions on Fedora 9, and the changes
Here is a patch which makes the file capabilities tests work again
in Fedora 9.
I say DONOTAPPLY because it requires a new libcap feature which
currently exists only in the libcap git tree. Once that feature is in a
libcap release, I can tweak the Makefile to only run with the new
libcap, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
