Fix minor bugs in the test case that cause the test to fail intermittently.
Also, print more debug info when test fails.
This fixes a bug reported by Sachin P. Sant.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
---
testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns17.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 11
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:50:12AM +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed following failures and fixed.
> 1. rt_sigprocmask01.c
> 2. rt_sigprocmask02.c
[...]
> diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_s
Hi,
I have noticed following failures and fixed.
1. tkill01.c
2. tkill02.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/tkill/tkill01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/t
Hi,
I have noticed following failures and fixed.
1. set_tid_address01.c
2. set_tid_address02.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_thread_area/set_thread
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. ssetmask01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ssetmask/ssetmask01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ssetmask/ssetmask01
Hi,
I have noticed following failures and fixed.
1. rt_sigprocmask01.c
2. rt_sigprocmask02.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocm
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. rt_sigsuspend01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigsuspend01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_s
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. set_tid_address01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/set_tid_address/set_tid_address01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscal
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. newuname01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/newuname/newuname01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/newuname/newuname01
Hi,
I have noticed following failures and fixed.
1. add_key01.c
2. add_key02.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/add_key/add_key01.c
b/testcases/kernel/sys
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. bdflush01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/bdflush/bdflush01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/bdflush/bdflush01.c
Hi,
I have noticed following issue and fixed.
1. Kernel Version
2. Machine Architecture.
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/tools/genhtml.pl b/tools/genhtml.pl
--- a/tools/genhtm
Hi,
I have noticed fail and fixed.
1. keyctl01.c
Please find the patch below and as attachment.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.ker...@gmail.com >
diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/keyctl/keyctl01.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/keyctl/keyctl01.c
--- a
Hi,
--static for gcc is really needed? I cannot find strong reason for
it.
Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO
Index: aio/aio02/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/io/aio/aio02/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 09:10:20 am GeunSik Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I am not the maintainer, so I don't have that ability. I did record a
> > successful test message in bodhi on LTP's behalf to encourage the
> > maintainer to ask for it to be marked st
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I am not the maintainer, so I don't have that ability. I did record a
> > successful test message in bodhi on LTP's behalf to encourage the maintainer
> > to ask for it to be marked stable asap.
> Ste
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:42:33 pm GeunSik Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > enabling testing still gave me only libcap-2.16-2, but
> > I downloaded and installed libcap-devel-2.16-4.fc11.i586.rpm
> > after which all compiled fine.
> >
> > GeunSik, please giv
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I am not the maintainer, so I don't have that ability. I did record a
> successful test message in bodhi on LTP's behalf to encourage the maintainer
> to ask for it to be marked stable asap.
Steve and Serge, Thanks.
Unfortunately,
If ltp versio
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:19:49 pm Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
> > >> I made patch file to solve below problem.
> > >
> > > well, NAK to the patch, but t
19 matches
Mail list logo
