Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Stephen Casey,
Do you think there needs to be some changes that should go in to your
respective SELinux and SMACK tests in LTP, in response to the
improvements in SELinux SMACK in linux-2.6.30 ?
Yes. As always, LTP is on the task list. Alas, also as always,
it's
Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Casey,
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 19:08 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Casey,
Thanks for these tests. However there are some comments below:
1) There is a little bit of lack of documentation. Can you please attach
atleast a README
the tests. There are
lot of scripts there. Not sure which one to run.
Sorry. I will work on up. The short answer is that each script
is self contained and verifies a different aspect of Smack.
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 22:15 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
Subrata Modak wrote:
Please send
Subrata Modak wrote:
Please send a tarball of the tests to: ltp-list ltp-l...@lists.sf.net,
if you are subscribed to the mailing list. Else:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/ltp-list,
Also please see:
http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/README,
if you would also
