And after installing autoconf-2.63, everything´s working fine for me as
well.
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:15 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Hi,
so are there any pending questions with autoconf ? are we all happy with
the
current state of things ?
I hope I've
so are there any pending questions with autoconf ? are we all happy with the
current state of things ?
-mike
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 12:37 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Thank you for feed back.
I've wanted about this patch.
ugh, this is not the way we want to take autotool integration. it is
supposed to be optional, not required.
I didn't want to rework on all Makefiles of LTP, too big task
ugh, this is not the way we want to take autotool integration. it is
supposed to be optional, not required.
clean is not supposed to imply distclean. if it did, what is the
point of distclean ? and the target is distclean, not dist-clean.
if the user does not run configure, then we default to
Thank you for feed back.
I've wanted about this patch.
ugh, this is not the way we want to take autotool integration. it is
supposed to be optional, not required.
I didn't want to rework on all Makefiles of LTP, too big task for me.
It takes much time; and It affects all of LTP. So I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
ugh, this is not the way we want to take autotool integration. it is
supposed to be optional, not required.
I didn't want to rework on all Makefiles of LTP, too big task for me.
It takes much time; and It affects all of LTP. So I
ugh, this is not the way we want to take autotool integration. it is
supposed to be optional, not required.
I didn't want to rework on all Makefiles of LTP, too big task for me.
It takes much time; and It affects all of LTP. So I introduced
autotool very limited way.
After making
Hi Yamato,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:08 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
And another thing to point out. Shouldn´t:
make clean
be removing stuff like configure, config.status, config.log,
autom4te.cache from the sources. It is retaining them. Is it expected ?
I would like them to
However, i wanted:
make clean
to do all that stuff. So, updated accordingly.
I guess this will make people familiar with autoconf
confusing.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
And another thing to point out. Shouldn´t:
make clean
be removing stuff like configure, config.status, config.log,
autom4te.cache from the sources. It is retaining them. Is it expected ?
I would like them to clean up on make clean.
I revisied my patch.
- signalfd.m4 is renamed to
And another thing to point out. Shouldn´t:
make clean
be removing stuff like configure, config.status, config.log,
autom4te.cache from the sources. It is retaining them. Is it expected ?
I would like them to clean up on make clean.
Regards--
Subrata
Currently I have no idea about the
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:18 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Hi Yamato,
Thanks for the patch introducing autoconf in LTP. I have few
questions/doubts here:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:39 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Hi,
I've clean my signalfd test case up with autoconf.
Hi Yamato,
Thanks for the patch introducing autoconf in LTP. I have few
questions/doubts here:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:39 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Hi,
I've clean my signalfd test case up with autoconf.
After applying the patch, do at ltp/
autoconf
autoheader
And another thing to point out. Shouldn´t:
make clean
be removing stuff like configure, config.status, config.log,
autom4te.cache from the sources. It is retaining them. Is it expected ?
I would like them to clean up on make clean.
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:07 +0530, Subrata
Hi,
I've clean my signalfd test case up with autoconf.
After applying the patch, do at ltp/
autoconf
autoheader
./configure
make (or cd testcases/kernel/syscalls/signalfd; make)
Benefits are:
- signalfd01.c doesn't depends on kernel version
(it used KERNEL_VERSION macro.)
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
