On Monday 24 August 2009 04:44:05 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 22 August 2009 22:37:28 CAI Qian wrote:
ENOSYS is the expected result if the kernel under test has no such
implementation, so I would consider TPASS or TCONF.
TPASS is
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 22 August 2009 22:37:28 CAI Qian wrote:
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed to compile on
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] The Best Practice to Skip Syscall Tests
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:06 -0700
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed
From: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] The Best Practice to Skip Syscall Tests
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:00:32 -0400
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed to compile on systems without such a
syscall. I am unsure what the best way
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, CAI Qiancaiq...@cclom.cn wrote:
From: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] The Best Practice to Skip Syscall Tests
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:00:32 -0400
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed to compile
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed to compile on systems without such a
syscall. I am unsure what the best way to handle it. The old ways are,
* add a kernel version check in the unshare tests code.
or
* add a m4 rule.
* modify the unshare tests
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 21 August 2009 07:57:39 CAI Qian wrote:
Test cases unshare failed to compile on systems without such a
syscall. I am unsure what the best way to handle it. The old ways are,
* add a kernel version check in the
