On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:19 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Thanks Serge.
Regards--
Subrata
---
.../kernel/containers/mqns/check_mqns_enabled.c|2
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:19, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:19, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Would it be acceptable to instead insert a WARN message beforehand and
reference the caveat behind using mq in a previous kernel version,
like was done with inotify02 recently, so that way the test is run,
but the user is educated on the fact that
On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:19, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
(Against the March intermediate release)
mqns support is expect in 2.6.30, not 2.6.29.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
.../kernel/containers/mqns/check_mqns_enabled.c|2 +-
1 files changed, 1
