Hi Cai,
Thanks very much for explaining everything.
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:48 +0800, Cai Qian wrote:
Hi Subrata,
From: Subrata Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] [KDUMP] [PROPOSED WORK] kdump on Xen hypervisor and
guests, more tests for utilities, like
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:00 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
As you all are aware that Masatake YAMATO has taken the lead in porting
the missing System Call test cases from CRACKERJACK project to LTP.
Since this is a huge effort, i would like to know if some of you would
be interested to join
Yes, before paching, the message_queue_test_05 would exhaust all the
message queues resource in system. After that, none of message_queue_test
cases could create message queue successfully.
I suggest to check the message queues resource before running the original
case and pached case.
you
Veerendra,
I am hoping that you will resend me these Patch series after
incorporating Sergei´s comments.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:07 +0530, Veerendra wrote:
Hi ,
Please find the patches for the testing of network NS.
The patches are created from the path
When compiling hackbench.c , I got the warning message:
---
$ ./testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler$ make
cc -I../../../../include -Wallhackbench.c -L../../../../lib -lltp
-lpthread -o hackbench
hackbench.c: In function ‘main’:
hackbench.c:350: warning: control reaches end of
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 17:18 +0800, Jin Bing Guo wrote:
When compiling hackbench.c , I got the warning message:
---
$ ./testcases/kernel/sched/cfs-scheduler$ make
cc -I../../../../include -Wall hackbench.c -L../../../../lib -lltp
-lpthread -o hackbench
hackbench.c: In function
Thanks for your reminder, sending patches as file attachments is better
in LOTUS NOTES.
Best regards!
Jin Bing Guo 郭晋兵
Subrata Modak
[EMAIL
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Recent OLS 2008 was a critical point in LTP´s evolution, as i got the
opportunity to meet several people across the Linux ecosystem, and
listened to their opinion about LTP. Here i would start a mail chain
with the above Subject line, discuss
On Aug 13 09:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:02:55 +0530 Subrata Modak wrote:
=
ISSUE # 1
=
The heavy users made a point of LTP having the capability to automate
testing completely. What they meant was LTP to have capability to do:
1)
Agreeing with what pretty much everyone else has said, I'd also like to
add that this isn't the first time someone has requested something like
this. Iirc, there was a small attempt at automating at least some part
of it, you may still find artifacts of it lingering around in the
scripts
To add to this discussion, I think the folks in the Autotest community
would be more likely to be involved in this issue than the LTP. You may
want to look at what the LTC team in Brazil has been doing with the
Autotest community around test automation.
-Robbie Williamson
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
If I remove the above entries, and if I have only this entry now in my
libclone.h
#ifndef SYS_unshare
#ifdef __NR_unshare
#define SYS_unshare __NR_unshare
#elif __i386__
#define SYS_unshare 310
#elif __ia64__
#define SYS_unshare 1296
#elif __x86_64__
12 matches
Mail list logo
