Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] matrix_mult.c: set_affinity to work when there are offline cpus

2008-10-15 Thread Gilles Carry
Timothy R. Chavez wrote: -int set_affinity(int cpuid) +int set_affinity(int thread_id) This argument seems pointless to me. In main_thread, where you call create_fifo_thread, you'll want to initialize the thread arguments to NULL, rather than cpuid, because, as you've already established,

Re: [LTP] [patch] container pidns testcase

2008-10-15 Thread Veerendra
CAI Qian wrote: Hi, Please see comments as below. --- Veerendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Attaching the patch for the testcase on PIDNS. Assertion: 1. kill -9 1 from inside a container does not kill container Steps: a) create container b) kill -9 1 c) Should not kill the

Re: [LTP] [patch] container pidns testcase

2008-10-15 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then +exit_code=$? In this case, the second $? will always be 0, because that is not the error code from if statement. Cai Qian +exit $exit_code +fi exit $exit_code - This SF.Net

Re: [LTP] [patch] container pidns testcase

2008-10-15 Thread Veerendra
CAI Qian wrote: Hi, +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + exit_code=$? In this case, the second $? will always be 0, because that is not the error code from if statement. Cai Qian oh, I got it now! I will send a fix for this. Thanks Veerendra C

Re: [LTP] [patch 1/9] Network NS - basic.patch

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 16:00 +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote: From: Benjamin Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: netns: fix restoration of original /proc values (ip_forward...) This small patches make the restoration of /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/$netdev/proxy_arp

Re: [LTP] OOM killer, on ltp hackbench test.

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:30 +0530, Veerendra wrote: Hi , I noticed the OOM killer while running the hackbench tests in zSeries. The machine had memory of 2GB and swap space of 1GB. While running the 'hackbench 300' noticed this OOMs. I used the z9 Lpar box to test this. It

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add mips64 support to profil01

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 14:55 -0700, Malov, Vlad wrote: Adding support for mips64. Use 64 bit variable to store the 64 bit address. Tested on mips64 system running Cavium Networks Octeon chip, Linux 2.6.27. The patch: Applies fine. Tested and Merged. Next time please include the following

Re: [LTP] Ptrace6 Test Broken on IA-64

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
This should have been fixed by now with all the Patches and changes that i have made. Please verify. Regards-- Subrata On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 00:02 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: Hi, When compiled ltp-base-20080930 on an IA-64 machine, it failed, cc -Wall -I../../include -g -Wall

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix bug in getcpu01.c

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:08 -0700, Malov, Vlad wrote: Simple bug in logic that defines when to run the test makes it run exclusively when support is NOT implemented. Tested on mips64 system running Cavium Networks Octeon chip, Linux 2.6.27 The fix: Thanks for the Fix. But the Patch was

Re: [LTP] cross compiling errors

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
GarrettĀ“s upcoming work will probably solve this problem. Gareet, what do you think about this ? Regards-- Subrata On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:10 -0400, Shane Volpe wrote: I'm running an embedded system and do not compile ltp on it instead I compile it on a host system and then copy it to a SD

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmem_test_06 Failed with Stack Randomization

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 04:13 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: Hi, With Exec-Shield in place, the Kernel automatically adjusts the stack downward by a random amount of bytes. This will cause the test failed occasionally on IA-32, because the 11th requested chunk of address space (bfe0-bff0)

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix the exit code in inotify cases

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
Thanks. Merged. Regards-- Subrata On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:49 +0800, Jin Bing Guo wrote: Hi, When I tested the inotify02 on ppc64, it passed all tests and returned 1 with an unnecessary event. - Running tests... test_start tag=inotify02 stime=1222503205 cmdline=inotify02

Re: [LTP] ltp-full-20080930 fails on s390

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:35 +0530, Sudhir Alluri wrote: Hi, I Ran LTP for a few hours, and noticed the folloeing testcases failed. Test Start Time: Tue Oct 14 12:08:43 2008

[LTP] [PATCH] add a check to gethostid01 test

2008-10-15 Thread Vinay Sridhar
Hello, The gethostid01 test fails when the host id is not set on a system. The gethostid() call retrieves as the host id. Added a check to compare the return value with 00 (omitted 1st two 0's as they could also be 0x on some systems; needs confirmation). Signed-off by : Vinay

Re: [LTP] [patch] container pidns testcase

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Veerendra [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: CAI Qian wrote: Hi, +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + exit_code=$? In this case, the second $? will always be 0, because that is not the error code from if statement. Cai Qian oh, I got it now! I will send a

Re: [LTP] ltp-full-20080930 build error on s390

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:24 +0800, Jin Bing Guo wrote: On 10/14 10:12AM, Sudhir Alluri wrote: Hi, I got the below build error, wheni tried to build on s390 platform Linux 2.6.16.21-0.8-default #1 SMP Mon Jul 3 18:25:39 UTC 2006 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux cc -Wall

Re: [LTP] spawn_ptrace_child.c

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:44 +0800, Jin Bing Guo wrote: Hi, Yes, I believe it's an error. The spawn_ptrace_child.c file is necessary to ptrace04 and ptrace06. To do a #include *.c file is not a good coding style. The simplest solution is to rename the spawn_ptrace_child.c to

Re: [LTP] compile issue with the arm: _NR_timerfd_create, __NR_timerfd_settime and __NR_timerfd_gettime

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:01 -0400, Shane Volpe wrote: I'm using an embedded arm processor (Xscale) and I get the following compile error: timerfd01.c:90: error: '__NR_timerfd_settime' undeclared (first use in this function) I have dug through past patches for this exact problem and have

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix for Build Failures And Warnings

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
Signed-off-by: CAI Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Cai for these fixes. You may want to revisit the latest sources again to find everything is working fine. I have made lots of changes today. Regards-- Subrata diff -ur ltp/pan/Makefile ltp-new/pan/Makefile --- ltp/pan/Makefile 2008-04-02

[LTP] [PATCH] Remove Unused Variable and Definition

2008-10-15 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, This patch cleans code a little bit by removing leftovers. Signed-off-by: CAI Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/nanosleep/nanosleep01.c.orig 2008-10-15 18:21:29.646239394 +0800 +++ ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/nanosleep/nanosleep01.c 2008-10-15

Re: [LTP] [patch] container pidns testcase

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:27 +0530, Veerendra wrote: Hi Attaching the patch for the testcase on PIDNS. Thanks Veerendra. You missed out: Signed-Off-By: Veerendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards-- Subrata Assertion: 1. kill -9 1 from inside a container does not kill container Steps: a)

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] add a check to gethostid01 test

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:03 +0530, Vinay Sridhar wrote: Hello, The gethostid01 test fails when the host id is not set on a system. The gethostid() call retrieves as the host id. Added a check to compare the return value with 00 (omitted 1st two 0's as they could also be 0x on

Re: [LTP] ltp-full-20080930 build failed on Linux / x86_64

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 15:51 +0530, Sudhir Alluri wrote: Hi, I get the following error, on make. Again not sure about this. May be the original author can figure out something. Ramon, Can you please look into this ? Regards-- Subrata

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Remap_file_pages Tests Failed for Older Kernels on IA-64

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 00:35 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: Hi, Remap_file_pages01 and remap_file_pages02 tests always failed on IA-64 with Kernel 2.6.9 as below, # ./remap_file_pages01 remap_file_pages011 FAIL : remap_file_pages error for page=1207959552, page_sz=32768, window_pages=14

Re: [LTP] OOM killer, on ltp hackbench test.

2008-10-15 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:30 +0530, Veerendra wrote: Hi , I noticed the OOM killer while running the hackbench tests in zSeries. The machine had memory of 2GB and swap space of 1GB. While running the 'hackbench 300' noticed this OOMs.

Re: [LTP] [PATCH: run_semaphore_test_01.sh]

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:31 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: --- Elder Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. The script run_semaphore_test_01 fails the first time it is run as the semaphore id is zero (subsequent runs are successful as the ids are nonzero.) The attached patch fixes this

Re: [LTP] Usage fix in memory controller testcase

2008-10-15 Thread Subrata Modak
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:25 +0530, Sudhir Kumar wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:14:26PM +0530, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: Description: The testcase return error when run `run_memctl_test.sh` with no argument. First you need to know what is the use of the variable passed to the

[LTP] Just curious: fail in ptrace06

2008-10-15 Thread Elder Costa
I have run the latest CVS version and noticed ptrace06 is not being compiled. Previous versions did compile but did not include it in the default test lists so it was not running. Anyway I am getting an error when I run it in two different systems with Ubuntu Feisty: ptrace06 16 FAIL :

[LTP] Patch: compilation glitches

2008-10-15 Thread Elder Costa
Hello. I had two errors when compiling the CVS version with Ubuntu. The one in regen.sh might have to do with some dash limitation (it complains about not supporting more than 32 shifts.) The one with the Makefile has to do with the version of lex I have here (lex 2.5.33) complaining about

Re: [LTP] Just curious: fail in ptrace06

2008-10-15 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, --- Elder Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have run the latest CVS version and noticed ptrace06 is not being compiled. Previous versions did compile but did not include it in the default test lists so it was not running. Anyway I am getting an error when I run it in two different

Re: [LTP] Ptrace6 Test Broken on IA-64

2008-10-15 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, --- Subrata Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This should have been fixed by now with all the Patches and changes that i have made. Please verify. The problem is still there. Cai Qian Regards-- Subrata On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 00:02 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: Hi, When compiled

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix for Build Failures And Warnings

2008-10-15 Thread CAI Qian
Hi Subrata, --- Subrata Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Signed-off-by: CAI Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Cai for these fixes. You may want to revisit the latest sources again to find everything is working fine. I have made lots of changes today. Yes, it finally compiles fine on both

[LTP] LTP testcase compilation errors

2008-10-15 Thread Edwin Varella
Hello, I get compilation errors when compiling LTP-full-20080930 version on s390x systems. Here's the identification of the system Linux FP3 2.6.16.21-0.8-default #1 SMP Mon Jul 3 18:25:39 UTC 2006 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux It'll be great if you could answer my questions below the