Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Shakthi Kannan skan...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there any options to runltp or any other means to just run the kernel
syscall tests?
runltp -f syscalls
How long does it take to run the runalltests.sh on
Quoting Cyril Hrubis (chru...@suse.cz):
Hi!
Are there still known issues with the pidns tests and 20110228 stable
release? I've got the same failure on 2 unrelated pieces of hardware
but both running SLE11SP1 (2.6.32) kernel. The pidns tests just hang
with multiple child processes. I
Quoting Peng Haitao (pen...@cn.fujitsu.com):
Hi Garrett,
Signed-off-by: Peng Haitao pen...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/unshare/unshare01.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/unshare/unshare01.c
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
That being said, it still puzzles me why other folks attached to
the project have been largely silent over the past couple months or
years (in particular the official maintainers), as I would figure that
they would have a vested interest in
Quoting ARJIT SHARMA (joyar...@gmail.com):
broken_ip4-version010 TINFO : - Test duration is 3600 [sec]
cut: option requires an argument -- 'f'
Try `cut --help' for more information.
What distribution are you using? Looks like the tests will need to
be tweaked to accomodate your version
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com):
Quoting ARJIT SHARMA (joyar...@gmail.com):
broken_ip4-version010 TINFO : - Test duration is 3600 [sec]
cut: option requires an argument -- 'f'
Try `cut --help' for more information.
What distribution are you using? Looks like
Quoting ARJIT SHARMA (joyar...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I was trying to run network stress tests on my side, but none of them
is passing.
it is not able to find the harware address at remote host, altough the
settings and configurations are as required and as mentioned in README and
Exit as soon as one breaks. Heck, clean it up by letting
set -e do it for me.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
---
.../kernel/security/securebits/run_securebits.sh | 18 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git
Quoting Jeffrey Burke (jbu...@redhat.com):
Folks,
It has been a while since I update LTP for selinux testing. I am currently
trying to use ltp-full-20100831 on RHEL5.6. I don't believe the procedure has
changed at least according to the README. But here are the steps I followed.
1.) tar
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
So I'm not sure what Serge was looking at...
Not me.
-serge
--
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Looks fine to be,i just need a little documentation file which would
say:
What securebits is all about (some pointers/links)? Any specific
configuration required to run these tests, etc ?
Serge,
Can you also provide me this ?
I
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Hi Serge,
Some comments about your provided code.
Thanks.
+AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_SECUREBITS],
+AC_CHECK_HEADERS(linux/securebits.h,[
+ LTP_SECUREBITS=yes
+])
+)
Some checks should probably be added for versioning as well as
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Serge E. Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Hi Serge,
Some comments about your provided code.
Thanks.
+AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_SECUREBITS
Quoting Sravan V Dodla (sra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Hello,
I have been facing an compilation issue with the latest version of LTP. After
some debugging I found out that the
I don't see that code in current ltp head. It checks HAVE_LIBCAP.
What code are you looking at?
flag
Quoting ARJIT SHARMA (joyar...@gmail.com):
hi,
in ima testcase all the 4 testcases are failing because of error as
cannot mount security fs
Why is this error coming..please tell me.
Do you have CONFIG_SECURITYFS=y ?
-serge
-0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Hello everybody,
We completed 4 months of 2010, but, i do not find major activity in
creating/writing/contributing new tests to LTP. Can we restart
contributing new tests to LTP ? I am sure
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:36 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:52 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:43 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Serge,
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn
debugging.
Changes in v2:
- Initialize status=0 at the top of child_1.sh to prevent overshadowing
a (meaningless) sshd failure
Signed-off-by: Dan Smith da...@us.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
thanks,
-serge
. The thing that
should scare us is if the call succeeds. If we give any false
positives, then true positives will seem less scary.
-serge
From 2cf7797329275126cc3f80a24bfb8bb2e3f44747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:30:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On May 5, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
p = index(buf, '.')+1;
Jinkeys! The intertubes archives insist I wrote that, but I'm finding
it hard to believe
:
may 4: address Garrett's feedback
1. single return 0 in print_caps.c
2. use $TMP if defined for location of caps_fifo
3. use tst_brkm in place of tst_resm.
may 5: address Garrett's comment:
don't add 1 to null pointer and then check for 1
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On May 5, 2010, at 11:56 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
Subject: LTPś sysctl03 test fails
Issues Description Below
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
So since we're all member of the doc team, send a patch for sysctl(2)
manpage ERRORS section :)
(mtk cc:d
Quoting Henry xu (feng...@windriver.com):
Hi,all
I test sysctl03 in x86 and ppc platform and product the same fails as
below.
r...@z530:/opt/ltp-full/testcases/bin ./sysctl03
sysctl031 TFAIL : Expected EPERM (1), got 13: Permission denied
sysctl032 TFAIL : Expected EPERM,
whether or not index
returns NULL instead of accessing memory like that?
Other than that, patch looks good.
From: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 02:59:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] check for index(3) returning NULL
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Serge, please add a Sign-off.
It's there in the patch in your attachment...
-serge
--
___
Ltp-list mailing list
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Munipradeep Beerakam
mprad...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that mqns test cases are failing. I am using March 2010 LTP.
After changing mq_open syscall in mqns_01.c file, test is passing. Same
thing
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Munipradeep Beerakam
mprad...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that mqns test
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns30.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns30.c
b/testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns30.c
index ea8c54c..5975b53 100644
---
Most of these are belated cleanup after the move to using /opt/ltp.
Also undoing an ill-advised replacement of return with tst_exit. All
filecaps tests now succeed on fedora 10.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/security/filecaps/filecapstest.sh |9
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Most of these are belated cleanup after the move to using /opt/ltp.
Also undoing an ill-advised replacement of return with tst_exit. All
filecaps tests now succeed
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
So the tests can pass
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/containers/mqns/mqns.h | 2 ++
testcases/kernel/containers/mqns/mqns_01
Quoting Mitani (mit...@ryobi.co.jp):
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Serge E. Hallyn [mailto:se...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:22 PM
To: Mitani
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] cap_bset_inh_bounds.c build failure
Quoting Mitani (mit
Quoting Mitani (mit...@ryobi.co.jp):
Hi,
I tired to upgrade libcap from libcap-1.0-20 to libcap-2.11.
My system is RHEL4.8 (x86) and kernel version is 2.6.9-89.ELsmp.
Oh, I'm sorry, I misunderstood from the first. I thought you wanted
to test a modern kernel on an older distro. So the
Quoting Mitani (mit...@ryobi.co.jp):
Hi,
I tried to build by using yesterday's git in my system (RHEL4.8 x86).
(ltp-dev-4837fee8a7c2de6a83c8927a574c792ca6dabe4e.tar.gz)
But build failed in cap_bset_inh_bounds.c with following message.
This is different from cap_bounds_r.c's problem
Quoting Mitani (mit...@ryobi.co.jp):
Hi Rishi,
I installed libcap-devel, but after configure, build failed, too.
[r...@rhel4-8 mitani]# rpm -qa | grep libcap
libcap-devel-1.10-20
libcap-1.10-20
[r...@rhel4-8 mitani]#
libcap-1.10-20 version is normal version
-ne 0 ]; then
exit_code=$tmp
fi
+unlink caps_fifo
exit $exit_code
-Rishi
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:10:04PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Remove the run-time checks and just have autoconf check for
libcap and setcap presence.
( applies on top of the patch I sent
.
(I'm sure there is an AC_ macro for finding a command)
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
configure.ac |1 +
m4/ltp-cap.m4 | 16 +
m4/ltp-prctl.m4| 31
Remove the run-time checks and just have autoconf check for
libcap and setcap presence.
( applies on top of the patch I sent this morning )
After this, filecaps tests compile, install, and pass on f10 at least.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
m4/ltp-cap.m4
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak
risra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:25:23AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper
Quoting Iranna D Ankad (iranna.an...@in.ibm.com):
LTP reports setcap is installed, but actually, my system has setcap
installed, along with all required libcap related rpms.
mx3950:/opt/ltp # setc
setcap setconsole setctsid
mx3950:/opt/ltp #
mx3950:/opt/ltp # rpm -qa | grep cap
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Iranna D Ankad (iranna.an...@in.ibm.com):
LTP reports setcap is installed, but actually, my system has setcap
installed, along with all required
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Right, the test is checking whether kill -1 inside a private pidns
kills all processes besides
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Mitani (mit...@ryobi.co.jp):
Hi,
I tried to test with 2010-02-11 cvs in RHEL5.4 system.
But the test brings termination of connection.
I examined
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Rishikesh (risra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Hi Garret,
With today's cvs getting following error while running the
container
What about today's *git* ?
What git repo do you mean?
The one Rishi is about
Quoting Rishikesh (risra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Hi Garret,
With today's cvs getting following error while running the container
What about today's *git* ?
-serge
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:37 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Yeah, you're right. I was trying to beat around this bush by not
copying these over, but it's better to have the test running and be
improperly designed than it is for regressions to leak
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 13:50 -0600
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 23:27 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Stephen Smalley s...@tycho.nsa.gov
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 13:38 -0800,
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 13:50 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Fails with:
cp: cannot stat
`/home/sds/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy/policy_files/generic/test_policy.*':
No such file or directory
You ran /home
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 13:50 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Fails with:
cp: cannot stat
`/home/sds/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy/policy_files/generic/test_policy
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 13:50 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Fails with:
cp: cannot stat
`/home/sds/ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@us.ibm.com):
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 13:50 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Fails with:
cp: cannot stat
`/home
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
It seems the Makefile rewrite last October broke the selinux testsuite.
Is it unreasonable to expect that someone who rewrote the Makefile would
actually try running the testsuite?
Please, revert the changes or fix them.
See
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
It seems the Makefile rewrite last October broke the selinux testsuite.
Is it unreasonable to expect that someone who rewrote the Makefile would
actually try running the testsuite?
Please, revert the changes or fix them.
See
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 5, 2010, at 8:30 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Ok, so before I commit I just want to make sure that this makes sense with
you:
The differences are:
1. The id -?r?u use.
Either one can be fooled, neither should be...
2. The while [ ! ... -a ... ] vs until [ ... -o ... ] logic (is more
Quoting Jiri Palecek (jpale...@web.de):
Serge E. Hallyn napsal(a):
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Hi Mike,
I have one question about one your big patch
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
Hi Serge,
When do this script need to be run? Before compiling or before /
while running?
-Garrett
Hi,
Either could do, but there's reason to do it at both. It doesn't need to be
run before each test, but has to load the module and set up
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Hi Mike,
I have one question about one your big patch
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/galak/ltp.git;a=commitdiff;h=391dc18fe3271fbf2ca1864a5299f091c31e0018
My question is why you add -1 in lib/cloner.c:65
+ ret =
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/security/p9auth/p9priv.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/p9auth/p9priv.sh
b/testcases/kernel/security/p9auth/p9priv.sh
index ad2eead..c1a14d0 100755
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Hi Mike,
I have one question about one your big patch
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/galak/ltp.git;a=commitdiff;h
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The glibc version removes the leading '/' from the message queue name.
Not doing so makes the system call fail. We could just remove the
'/' from SLASH_MQ1, if for some
The glibc version removes the leading '/' from the message queue name.
Not doing so makes the system call fail. We could just remove the
'/' from SLASH_MQ1, if for some reason that were preferred, but using
glibc functions when possible seems cleaner to me.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
Quoting Rishikesh (risra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Thanks Suka,
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:31 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
Subrata Modak [subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
|
| pidns21:
|
arguments are always consistent.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
include/test.h | 10 ++
lib/cloner.c | 102
testcases/kernel/containers/libclone/libclone.c| 32
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 23:05 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Mike Frysinger (vap...@gentoo.org):
On Monday 21 September 2009 19:06:44 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Define ltp_clone() and ltp_clone_malloc() in libltp, and convert
Quoting Mike Frysinger (vap...@gentoo.org):
On Monday 21 September 2009 19:06:44 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Define ltp_clone() and ltp_clone_malloc() in libltp, and convert existing
clone usages to them. (clone04 can't use it bc it wants to pass NULL,
which ltp_clone() will for many arches
the openssl check to checkp9auth.sh.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
README |9 ++
runtest/p9auth |2 +
testcases/kernel/security/Makefile |2 +-
testcases/kernel/security/p9auth
considering applying.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
include/test.h |8 ++
lib/cloner.c | 92
testcases/kernel/containers/libclone/libclone.c| 32 +---
testcases
sure we can setuid when there is a valid hash
3. make sure we cannot setuid if there is a valid hash,
but our original uid isn't the one specified
in the token.
Run the testcase using
./runltp -f p9auth
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 16:13 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 10:10:27 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Also fix the libnetns helper to, like the libclone one, special-case
hppa and pass the bottom of the stack to clone2
It can't pass right now, and leaves the system in a bad state on
its inevitable failure.
Leave the testcase there though since one day we will hopefully
support it.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
testcases/kernel/containers/netns/runnetnstest.sh | 25
1
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 10:14 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Hi All,
can you please to run clone01 syscall test on any x86 machine? I am
getting fault
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Garrett Cooperyaneg...@gmail.com
wrote:
clone(2) is externally defined in sched.h
Quoting Michal Simek (michal.si...@petalogix.com):
Hi All,
can you please to run clone01 syscall test on any x86 machine? I am
getting fault there when I run it 10 times for example.
The same problem I have on Microblaze.
./clone01 -c 10
clone01 1 TPASS : clone() returned 22738
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
clone(2) is externally defined in sched.h, and as such
testcases/kernel/security/digsig/writeexec/libwritetest.c fails to
compile with -Wall due to a shadowed declaration.
Signed-off-by: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Index:
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Garrett Cooperyaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
clone(2) is externally defined in sched.h, and as such
testcases/kernel/security/digsig/writeexec/libwritetest.c fails to
compile with -Wall due to a shadowed declaration.
Quoting M. Mohan Kumar (mo...@in.ibm.com):
[PATCH] pidns14
Container-init may be immune to unhandled fatal signals (like SIGUSR1)
even if they are from ancestor namespace. SIGKILL/SIGSTOP are the only
reliable signals to a container-init from ancestor namespace. Make sure
that
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Steve Grubbsgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I am not the maintainer, so I don't have that ability. I did record a
successful test message in bodhi on LTP's behalf to encourage the maintainer
to ask for it to be marked stable
a look in the morning, but Andrew do you know
offhand what the problem is with capability.h (in F11 I gather) that
would cause:
Serge E. Hallyn,
Thanks for your opinion about this report that I posted.
Yes. My below patch is private patch to solve make error on Fedora 11
distribution
Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com):
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:19:49 pm Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Serge E. Hallynse...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
I made patch file to solve
Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com):
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 12:19:49 pm Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Serge E. Hallynse...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
I made patch file to solve
Quoting GeunSik Lim (leem...@gmail.com):
I made patch file to solve below problem.
well, NAK to the patch, but this is a real problem that needs to
be fixed. I'll take a look in the morning, but Andrew do you know
offhand what the problem is with capability.h (in F11 I gather) that
would cause:
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Signed-off-by: Gui Xiaohua gu...@cn.fujitsu.com
Serge,
Your view on this new solution ?
Oops, i forgot to officially note:
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
thanks,
-serge
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 08:45 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Gui Xiaohua (gu...@cn.fujitsu.com):
The child-process wait SIGUSR1 which would be sended by parent-process,
if the child-process execute sigtimedwait() after parent
Quoting Gui Xiaohua (gu...@cn.fujitsu.com):
The child-process wait SIGUSR1 which would be sended by parent-process,
if the child-process execute sigtimedwait() after parent-process send
the signal, it would never receive the SIGUSR1 from parent-process.
I cann't make sure the SIGUSR1 be
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 09:06 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Thanks. With this, i think all the patches sent by you has been merged.
Please let me know if i had missed something.
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 07:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 09:06 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Thanks
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 07:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 09:06 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
Thanks
Hi Stephen,
I'm trying to test all of your patches. But I'm having the (lately
usual) static libs problem. tests/inherit/Makefile specifies that
selinux_inherit_* should be compiled -static and -lselinux, but
libselinux.a is not installed. What did you do about this - did
you compile
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:11 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Add capability bounding set testcases, to verify the following:
1. prctl(CAP_BSET_READ, 0..NCAPS) returns 1
2. prctl(CAP_BSET_READ, -1|NCAPS+1) return -1
Quoting Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Verify the existence of openssl/sha.h not libcrypto, which is
included in multiple packages, to determine if openssl-devel
Quoting Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Verify the existence of openssl/sha.h not libcrypto, which is
included in multiple packages, to determine if openssl-devel is
installed.
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar zo...@us.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
This stops trying to
Quoting Jiri Palecek (jirka@debian.POK.IBM.COM):
Hello,
while running the ltp selinux tests on Debian, I found some problems:
1) the testdomain attribute cannot have setcurrent permission to itself. This
is because in Debian refpolicy, only domains with attribute set_curr_context
can
Add capability bounding set testcases, to verify the following:
1. prctl(CAP_BSET_READ, 0..NCAPS) returns 1
2. prctl(CAP_BSET_READ, -1|NCAPS+1) return -1
3. prctl(CAP_BSET_DROP, -1|NCAPS+1) returns -1
4. prctl(CAP_BSET_DROP, 0..NCAPS) returns 1
4b.
Quoting Jiří Paleček (jpale...@web.de):
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:32:43 +0200, Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Stephen,
Would you like to say something about the following Patch ?
If the motivation is to support multiple
Hi,
I had intended to write the keepcaps and securebits testcases,
but given that prctl(CAPBSET_READ) was broken for quite awhile in
mainline, I figured I'd start there. I inted to write the remaining
testcases soon.
These are CERTAINLY NOT ready to be applied. I first need to
write the
Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
Stephen ??
Heh, this isn't an selinux issue, just trivially correct.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
-serge
Forwarded Message
From: Jiri Palecek ji...@debian.pok.ibm.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
