I think you're going about this the wrong way. The essence of LTSP is that the
clients load a tiny OS from the server, and then applications run on the server
and just display on the clients. If your clients are hearty enough, individual
applications can be designated to actually run on the
A few questions:
Will this behave like LTPS and give each user their own remote desktop that is
not affected by other users?
Will they be chrooted or put on a virtual machines so they can not violate the
integrity of the base system if they do something bad intentionally or
accidentally?
Can I
Chad wrote:
A few questions:
Will this behave like LTPS and give each user their own remote desktop that
is not affected by other users?
Yes.
Will they be chrooted or put on a virtual machines so they can not violate
the integrity of the base system if they do something bad intentionally
Hello list,
I am new to LTSP (about 2 -3 weeks) and have a few questions.
First some background on my set-up:
I have a rack of about 40 servers 2000 miles away.
I run CentOS on all of them.
I wanted to set up LTSP for access over the internet in both of the following
ways:
1. Via a thin or thick
On Friday 19 August 2005 13:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:06 am, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
The clients are going to be used for a single function. They will run
FireFox and connect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 19 August 2005 13:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:06 am, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
The clients are going to be used for a single function. They will run
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
The clients are going to be used for a single function. They will run
FireFox and connect to single URL on our LAN. The URL will be different
for each client and Firefox will be configured to use the URL as its
default
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:06 am, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
The clients are going to be used for a single function. They will run
FireFox and connect to single URL on our LAN. The URL will be different
for each
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 19/08/2005 at 08:46 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:06 am, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
Given the above scenario how much RAM will I need in the server? Will
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 19/08/2005 at 08:46 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:06 am, Chuck Stuettgen wrote:
I am planning a small (30 clients) LTSP deployment and have few
questions.
Given the above scenario how much RAM will I need in the server? Will
Keir,
The webcam package was quite old. It was for version 3.0 of LTSP.
Somebody needs to update it to work with LTSP-4.1.1, but so far, I don't
think anybody is working on that.
Any volunteers?
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Keir Vaughan-Taylor wrote:
There were a
There were a few utilites supplied with previous download page and I had
installed Andrew Williams ltspwebcam on my previous ltsp version. One of
the features of this utility is it provided modules/drivers for a number
of webcams including the controversial logitech (philips) drivers pwc.o
Am Montag, 7. Juni 2004 11:59 schrieb John Sutton:
Hi there
To date I have been using netboot's mknbi (version 0.8, just because it
was
easier to compile than etherboot's mknbi back in 1998 and I haven't seen
any need to change it since ;-) while at the same time using etherboot's
rom
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, John Sutton wrote:
BTW, I downloaded ltsp_initrd_kit-3.0.13-i386.tgz from sourceforge because it
is marked as Source .gz in the rightmost column of showfiles.php. But it
isn't source at all, it is binary! How (from what sources, by what build
procedure) is this
Am Dienstag, 8. Juni 2004 18:54 schrieb John Sutton:
Yes, I tripped over that one some time back ;-) Now I only ever download
the 5.0.11 release so I am stuck in a dying backwater... but OTOH I haven't
_yet_ needed a driver which I couldn't find in that release ;-)
The newer releases bring
Hi there
I've been using diskless client booting for some years but I'm new to LTSP in
particular. I think it is probably the way to go for me so that I don't have
to maintain my own configuration!
This far I've only read some docs and downloaded
ltsp_initrd_kit-3.0.13-i386.tgz, which is
Am Montag, 7. Juni 2004 11:59 schrieb John Sutton:
Hi there
To date I have been using netboot's mknbi (version 0.8, just because it was
easier to compile than etherboot's mknbi back in 1998 and I haven't seen
any need to change it since ;-) while at the same time using etherboot's
rom code
17 matches
Mail list logo
