W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
>
> What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
> more than just independent
Regarding Fat Clients...
For us in Ontario, Canada, we can obtain PCs for free from Computers for
Schools (CFS) . Given that most arrive with 2 GB RAM (some with 1 gb) - they
are ideal for use with LTSP. They are powerful enough, and almost in all cases
perform just fine. Setup on client side
As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
more than just independent PCs with a complete OS which merely mount
their $HOMEs from
On 2016-09-20, Rolf-Werner Eilert wrote:
> What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
> more than just independent PCs with a complete OS which merely mount
> their $HOMEs from some kind of NAS?
In the context of LTSP, Fat Clients boot from the network and
