On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:25 AM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
I have a 7G index. A query for a random term comes back fast (300ms)
when I'm not using a DateFilter but when I add the DateFilter it takes
2.6 seconds. Way too long. I assume this is because the filter API
does a post process so it has to
On Mar 29, 2004, at 8:41 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 29, 2004, at 4:25 AM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
I have a 7G index. A query for a random term comes back fast (300ms)
when I'm not using a DateFilter but when I add the DateFilter it
takes 2.6 seconds. Way too long. I assume this is because
Erik Hatcher wrote:
One more point... caching is done by the IndexReader used for the
search, so you will need to keep that instance (i.e. the
IndexSearcher) around to benefit from the caching.
Great... Damn... looked at the source of CachingWrapperFilter and it
makes sense. Thanks for the
I've added some information contained on this thread on the wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/DateRangeQueries
If you wish to add more information, go right ahead, but since I added
this info, I believe it's ultimately my responsibility to maintain it.
sv
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Kevin
