for each read() syscall that local
filesystems
and NFS do not have
- the default debug level for lustre is punishing for small reads.
Try
setting sysctl -w lnet.debug=0 to test this. The default debug
level
will be changing in lustre 1.6.1.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL
Extra, I zero'ed /proc/fs/lustre/llite/fs0/read_ahead_stats and re-
ran the test and checked the read ahead stats afterward... and they
were all zero. So, I assume this means that Lustre isn't doing any
read ahead in this case.
On 17/07/2007, at 9:49 AM, Stuart Midgley wrote:
We
triggered by this code,
but it doesn't appear to be. Any way I can tune Lustre to work better
with this code? (I know, change the code, but it isn't that easy - this
is a c example of an strace of a java app - and changing the original java
app isn't so easy).
Thanks
Stu.
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
Afternoon
Is the atime of a file stored on the mds or on an ost? I can imagine
positive and negatives with both approaches.
Thanks.
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https
172.16.0.0/24 eth0# lustre nic1
route add -net 172.16.1.0/24 eth1# lustre nic2
route add -net 172.16.4.0/24 eth0# compute nic1
route add -net 172.16.5.0/24 eth1# compute nic2
now, does this play well with lnet? Am I getting what I want?
Thanks
Stu.
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL
?
Thanks,
Robert
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
reading the
above I guess you should probably run the getfattr/setfattr
commands on the OSTs as well as the MDT.
Stephen
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com
deactivate
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
.
Will this work? Has anybody tired such a scheme?
Thanks.
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
10 matches
Mail list logo