On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 09:40 -0400, Mark True wrote:
Thanks so much for the prompt response, I do have a couple of
questions for clarification:
Does the hardware makeup of the OSS affect the speed of the OSTs?
Of course. An OST is only going to go as fast as the hardware that it's
made up
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:51 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So any node does you lose the data?
I will parse that as so if you lose any node, you lose data? and the
answer to that is yes. If you lose an OST, you lose data. If you lose
the MDT you lose the entire filesystem. Lustre assumes
Hello Tamás,
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 16:41:55 Papp Tamás wrote:
Dear All,
Is there any reason to not user kernels with version 2.6.22.x above
2.6.22.14 or should it work?
I've just compiled it with 2.6.22.19 and I can mount the cluster, but
after the first ls command it gives me an oops,
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:09 -0400, Brock Palen wrote:
A post a few days back recommended that the MGS be placed on its own
disk for all but toy setups I think was the comment.
Yeah.
How much space does the MGS require?
Very little. I think we have discussed here that 100MB should be lots
Papp Tamás wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Tamás,
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 16:41:55 Papp Tamás wrote:
Dear All,
Is there any reason to not user kernels with version 2.6.22.x above
2.6.22.14 or should it work?
I've just compiled it with 2.6.22.19 and I can mount the
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Papp Tamás wrote:
Papp Tamás wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Tamás,
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 16:41:55 Papp Tamás wrote:
Dear All,
Is there any reason to not user kernels with version 2.6.22.x above
2.6.22.14 or should it
I don't think it would
be much, such that could it share spindles with the journal for the
MDS file system?
Hrm. Given it's relatively low use, I'd think that would be fine.
I have a question ... if the MGS is used so infrequently relative to the use
of the MDS, why is it (is it?)
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 12:40 -0700, Klaus Steden wrote:
I have a question ... if the MGS is used so infrequently relative to the use
of the MDS, why is it (is it?) problematic to locate it on the same volume
as the MDT?
Our mountconf expert engineers probably know all of the reasons but one
On Monday 16 June 2008 04:35:41 am Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote:
Is there any word on when the IB packages might be making it up to
the download site for 1.6.5? As had been previously noted, they were
missing when the rest of 1.6.5 was pushed.
I'd like to support this request, since this is
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 21:38, Brian J. Murrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 04:35 -0700, Johnlya wrote:
I tested it and it can work. But I don't do it by its method. I want
to add space like adding OST.
That is currently not possible. The only method we support for MDT
We have ~1.4 billion inodes and we're using about 50 million. We use
lots of small files so I took our highest utilization ever and doubled
it. Better safe than sorry.
We did format with an inode every 1024 bytes because we use no striping.
--
Daniel Leaberry
Senior Systems Administrator
11 matches
Mail list logo
