Hi, Christopher, Howard and Edward,
thank you very very much for your answers! I'll try to find that POD
CD, and will order Hoban's publication as well!
Saludos from Barcelona,
Manolo
El 17/09/2008, a las 6:04, Edward Martin escribió:
Howard is correct.
The first suite of Respighi does
Dear Manolo:
You mentioned the first 'Ancient Airs Dances' suite by Respighi: The
second and third suites contain music from Besard's Thesaurus
Harmonicus (1603), as well as one from his Novus Partus (1617). These
are all available - with Besard's many original errors corrected
Dear lutelisters,
I was listening to the 1st Suite by Respighi (Antiche Arie e Danze),
and became curious: the first and second pieces are by Molinaro and V.
Galilei, and the 3rd and 4th are Anon.
Which pieces exactly are the originals used by Respighi? Where are
they available (I mean the
Dear collective wisdom,
What carbonfiber guages would be appropriate in your opinion for octaves A
and B at 97cm, and C, D and E at 87.5cm?
Thanks in advance,
RT
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Dear Roman,
perhaps my online string calculator is of some help there:
Just select pitch, length of the strings and diapasons and your instrument
and it will calculate an entire set.
You can adjust tension and length of each string to match your instrument.
You can find it at:
On 9/17/2008, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear collective wisdom,
What carbonfiber guages would be appropriate in your opinion for octaves A
and B at 97cm, and C, D and E at 87.5cm?
Well, using my calculator
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mus/NewScalc/
I could suggest the
^Thanks!
RT
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:55 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: string calculations help
On 9/17/2008, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear collective wisdom,
What
Thanks Benjamin!
Your machine is a bit confusing because it provides only for one diapason
setting at a time.
RT
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Stehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Roman Turovsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:43
Oops, this was 440:
970 mm
A: 0.58, 0.655
B: 0.517, 0.583
875 mm
c: 0.541, 0.61
d: 0.482, 0.544
e: 0.425, 0.485
Here also in 415:
970 mm
A: 0.615, 0.694
B: 0.548, 0.619
875 mm
c: 0.574, 0.647
d: 0.511, 0.577
e: 0.455, 0.514
Arto
To get on or off this list see list information
Dear Roman,
well, a jauch baroque lute would indeed be the most complicated instrument
to use with that programm...
However, using more than one diapason length for the initial calculation
would make it more confusing for everyone without a jauch baroque lute or
english theorbo, so i guess
At 09:40 PM 9/16/2008, howard posner wrote:
In 1994 Dick Hoban's Lyre Music Publications published Oscar
Chilesotti's Da un Codice Lauten-buch, Dick's re-intabulation of
Chilesotti's transcriptions in neat, easy-to-read large-type French
tablature, spiral bound. You can order it from:
I had mine 8 + 6. For F# and G#, indeed, very usefull when playing
continuo. But after changing to gut I was not satisfied with 7 and 8
(I know: too small a theorbo in the first place, but that has its
advantages, too). So had 7 + 7 for a while and then 6 + 8. Sound is
so much better now.
On Sep 17, 2008, at 5:24 AM, Nigel Solomon wrote:
Even though most surviving theorbos are strung 6 + 8, does anyone
know of any originals strung 8 + 6 as many modern players seem to
prefer?
There are some instruments in the Lute Society of America's database
that appear to be theorbos
Hello,
If possible, I would like to be forwarded contact information for lute
instructors in the San Francisco Bay area located in the peninsula
region (eg, Palo Alto, San Mateo).
Many thanks in advance, Todd
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Marie Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:52 AM
| Dear collective wisdom,
|
| Could anyone on this list give me some precisions about the attribution
of some pieces in Galilei's Fronimo (1584
I've been plinking around on a cheap guitar I have, trying to get a
sense of what it would be like to play a lute. I'm guessing that the
likeness would be increased by using a capo. Does this sound right?
Any suggestions on where to place the capo for the most lute-like
experience, in terms of
16 matches
Mail list logo
