[LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners

2017-03-16 Thread Max Langer
f > Of howard posner > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 9:17 AM > To: Lute List > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners > > It’s always nice to have the score, or the melodic line, in the continuo > part. I’ve done a lot of cutting and pasting

[LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners

2017-03-15 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
Of howard posner Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 9:17 AM To: Lute List Subject: [LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners It’s always nice to have the score, or the melodic line, in the continuo part. I’ve done a lot of cutting and pasting to avoid inconvenient page turns. > On Mar

[LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners

2017-03-15 Thread David van Ooijen
When accompanying a soloist, I prefer to see his/part. Otherwise bass part is more convenient. But I can live with either score or part. Recits are the exception: I want to read these along. David On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 17:19, howard posner <[1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com> wrote:

[LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners

2017-03-15 Thread howard posner
It’s always nice to have the score, or the melodic line, in the continuo part. I’ve done a lot of cutting and pasting to avoid inconvenient page turns. > On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:25 AM, Edward Chrysogonus Yong > wrote: > > Dear Lutenetters who play basso continuo, > Is

[LUTE] Re: Continuo: Score vs Part; also Page-Turners

2017-03-15 Thread Miles Dempster
Hello Edward, There have been positive comments on this list about using a tablet and foot-operated page turner. I’m thinking adopting this solution when the next iPad Pro is released, which I believe will be within a few weeks. Miles > On Mar 15, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Edward Chrysogonus Yong